Sunday, October 30, 2016

PHOTO EXHIBITION - DEVOLVER LOS DESAPARECIDOS / BRING BACK THE DISAPPEARED

Devolver los Desaparecidos!
Bring Back the Disappeared!


Photographs by David Bacon, Antonio Nava, Emily Pederson and Leopoldo Peña


Eastside Cultural Center
2277 International Blvd., Oakland, CA

October thru December, 2016
Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, 1-5PM
Reception:  Thursday, November 10, 6PM

eastsidearts@yahoo.com
eastsideartsalliance.com
510-533-6629


These photographs document the disappearance of political activists, migrants and ordinary people in Mexico, in the context of political repression, economic exploitation, migration and drug violence.  They show the heroic resistance of Mexico's social movements and their fight for social justice, and the solidarity of people in the U.S.






__________________________________________


THE REALITY CHECK - David Bacon blog
** http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com (http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com)

EN LOS CAMPOS DEL NORTE:  Farm worker photographs on the U.S./Mexico border wall
** http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=fc67a76dbb9c31aaee896aff7&id=0644c65ae5&e=dde0321ee7 (http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=fc67a76dbb9c31aaee896aff7&id=0644c65ae5&e=dde0321ee7)

Youtube interview about the show with Alfonso Caraveo (Spanish)
** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJeE1NO4c_M&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJeE1NO4c_M&feature=youtu.be)

Interviews with David Bacon about his book, The Right to Stay Home:

Book TV: A presentation of the ideas in The Right to Stay Home at the CUNY Graduate Center
** http://booktv.org/Watch/14961/The+Right+to+Stay+Home+How+US+Policy+Drives+Mexican+Migration.aspx (http://booktv.org/Watch/14961/The+Right+to+Stay+Home+How+US+Policy+Drives+Mexican+Migration.aspx)

KPFA - Upfront with Brian Edwards Tiekert
** https://soundcloud.com/kpfa-fm-94-1-berkeley/david-bacon-on-upfront-9-20 (https://soundcloud.com/kpfa-fm-94-1-berkeley/david-bacon-on-upfront-9-20)

________________________________________


Books by David Bacon

The Right to Stay Home:  How US Policy Drives Mexican Migration  (Beacon Press, 2013)
** http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=2328 (http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=2328)

Illegal People -- How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants  (Beacon Press, 2008)
Recipient: C.L.R. James Award, best book of 2007-2008
** http://www.beacon.org/Illegal-People-P780.aspx (http://www.beacon.org/Illegal-People-P780.aspx)

Communities Without Borders (Cornell University/ILR Press, 2006)
** http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100558350 (http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100558350)

The Children of NAFTA, Labor Wars on the U.S./Mexico Border (University of California, 2004)
** http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520244726 (http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520244726)

En Español:

EL DERECHO A QUEDARSE EN CASA  (Critica - Planeta de Libros)
** http://www.planetadelibros.com.mx/el-derecho-a-quedarse-en-casa-libro-205607.html (http://www.planetadelibros.com.mx/el-derecho-a-quedarse-en-casa-libro-205607.html)

HIJOS DE LIBRE COMERCIA (El Viejo Topo)
** http://www.tienda.elviejotopo.com/prestashop/capitalismo/1080-hijos-del-libre-comercio-deslocalizaciones-y-precariedad-9788496356368.html?search_query=david+bacon&results=1 (http://www.tienda.elviejotopo.com/prestashop/capitalismo/1080-hijos-del-libre-comercio-deslocalizaciones-y-precariedad-9788496356368.html?search_query=david+bacon&results=1)

For more articles and images, see  ** http://dbacon.igc.org (http://dbacon.igc.org)
and ** http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com (http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com)

Thursday, October 27, 2016

'WE'RE HOMELESS AND WE VOTE!"

'WE'RE HOMELESS AND WE VOTE!" - Homeless People Want a Voice in This Election
By David Bacon
Truthout Photoessay, 10/28/16
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/38166-we-re-homeless-and-we-vote-homeless-people-want-a-voice-in-this-election


 MuZiK, a resident of the occupation, in her tent in the middle of Adeline Street.


Berkeley, California -- By the time you read this, Berkeley's intentional mobile homeless community will probably have been forced to migrate again, in yet one more forcible relocation.

A week ago, at five in morning, six city trucks and a U-Haul van pulled up at the tent encampment on a peaceful, leaf-covered median in the middle of south Berkeley's Adeline Street. Each truck had two municipal workers on board. Half a dozen police patrol cars accompanied them, red and blue lights flashing in the dark.

Brad, one of the camp residents, sounded the warning. Sleepy tent dwellers quickly began to text supporters, warning that the city was threatening once again to throw tents and belongings into trucks and force people to leave.



James Cartmill, a veteran and resident of the occupation, in his tent on the grass median in the middle of Adeline Street.


"We went into delaying tactics while we got community support mobilized," recalls Mike Zint, one of the leaders of this homeless community. "That doesn't stop them, but every time this happens we get more support. So they sat there in their trucks for the next six hours -- a dozen city workers and a code compliance officer, all on overtime. They took seven cops off patrol. And in the end, after all the arguments, we only moved about 200 feet, across the street. And how much did that cost?"

This homeless community is not just a group of people trying to find a place to live.  They call themselves an "intentional community" with a political purpose - forcing homelessness into public debate and defending the rights of homeless people.  Homeless activists are fighting for the same things in many cities.  Together, they are beginning to have an impact on local policies toward unhoused people [people who have no formal housing].  Political participation by homeless communities is giving them a voice in the national debate over homelessness as well.



The occupation on the grass median in the middle of Adeline Street.


Several weeks ago the group of people in this community "popped tents" as they say, in front of the Impact HUB, an office where the city has decided to centralize most services for homeless people. They protested an intake process they say screens out applicants for housing.  Writing in the local Street Spirit newspaper, Dan McMullan, who runs the Disabled People Outside Project, recalls, "I spent a week trying to get help for a disabled woman in a wheelchair and had to watch as she slept in front of the women's shelter one night, and the Harrison House the next. But she could not get in. I couldn't believe it."  He goes on to say that a HUB employee said the woman didn't fit the intake criteria, and that she was denied reconsideration of her case.

But the community's objections go beyond the immediate denial of services. They condemn the way the city treats homeless people as victims -- as passive recipients of services -- rather than people capable of governing themselves.

For weeks their camp has moved from place to place, in a peregrination Zint calls the Poor Tour. "It's a mobile occupation that can pop up anywhere," he explains. "We're exposing the fact that there is no solution -- nothing but exposure for the homeless. And exposure [the physical cost of sleeping outside] is killing a lot of people."



Ronald Vargas sticks his hands out of the tent in the morning, looking for his shoes.


A recent death was one of the reasons for launching the Poor Tour. On September 19, Roberto Benitas, a day laborer, died sleeping in a doorway. Benitas worked minimum wage jobs, standing in the bitter cold each morning in front of nearby lumberyards, trying to flag down contractors in their pickup trucks. Getting an occasional day's work was never enough to pay Berkeley's skyrocketing rents.

McMullan angrily charged, "Not a cent went into Social Security for the aging worker. When he died in a doorway of the defunct U-Haul rental shop at Allston Way and San Pablo Avenue, it took a day or so for anyone to even notice." McMullen and a progressive city council candidate organized a memorial for Benitas, and the Poor Tour started days later.

Another reason for the tour is the November election, and an effort by this group of activists to use it to assert themselves politically. For over two years, homeless activists have been increasingly involved in Berkeley city politics.






Banners at the Adeline Street occupation, including the banner for First They Came for the Homeless.


The roots of this mobile occupation actually go back to Occupy San Francisco, and the decision by some of its residents to cross San Francisco Bay to Berkeley in the wake of Occupy's dispersal. At first they lived for months in tents in front of a local Staples store. Then, two years ago, Zint and others set up an encampment in front of Berkeley's main post office.

The Post Office occupation became a political weapon, the most visible part of a broader coalition that successfully fought the sale of the New Deal-era building to private developers. That coalition eventually included even the mayor and the city administration, which filed suit to block the sell-off.

The community of tents, tarps and literature tables on the steps lasted for over a year and a half, before the Post Office Police finally drove the tent dwellers away. Postal authorities then built an imposing fence of iron bars around the empty space where the tents had been, to keep anyone from ever setting foot again on that section of sidewalk.



The occupation on the grass median in the middle of Adeline Street.


That certainly felt like revenge to activists. While allied against the Post Office, the encampment's residents had increasingly criticized the current city administration. They charge that Berkeley has given developers a green light to build a wave of market rate housing that is gentrifying the city, and at the same time creating more homelessness.

They pointed to a recent study by the San Francisco Planning Commission, which found that every set of 100 market-rate condominiums required the labor of about 43 working-class families to maintain them and support their residents. Not only don't the condos create housing for poorer residents, but they increase housing demand at the bottom of the market, without coming up with any places for people to live. The net result is the increasing displacement of low-income people.

The post office coalition broke down entirely when conservative members of the city council, backed by the Downtown Business Association, pushed through an ordinance that restricts the space for the belongings of homeless people on public sidewalks. During the debate, the Post Office camp activists set up a new occupation in front of the old City Hall to make their opposition visible, called Liberty City.




Ronald Vargas begins to cry as he talks about the hard times in his life.

In an interview for Truthout, MuZiK, one of those displaced in the uprooting of the camp on Adeline Street, envisioned a growing use of occupations. MuZiK noted that, while it might make people uncomfortable, "if our protest is anything other than a short 'here today, gone tomorrow' sort of deal ... we got a lot of time on our hands, so don't hate it if we choose to spend it fighting for what's right!"

In the wake of the sit-lie battle, another resident of the occupation, Mike Lee, declared himself a candidate for mayor. His campaign dramatizes the idea that homeless people should be given space to set up tents and create a self-governing community. At the Post Office and Liberty City, "what's being created is an intentional community," Lee explains, "where people come together and intentionally create an entity for mutual aid and voluntary cooperation, so that they can survive together and solve their own problems. Homeless people have always formed communities, whether we were considered 'hobos' or homeless people or just 'bums.' Homo sapiens are very social animals. We come together naturally."

At the Post Office encampment, voter registration forms appeared on the tables in front of the tents. "We're homeless and we vote!" Lee says. "There is a political purpose here, to change the way public policy is crafted and implemented. As homeless people we are the true experts. Organizing is the solution to homelessness, and the people responsible for solving homelessness are the homeless themselves." Lee has put forward detailed plans and budgets, showing how the city could use a vacant community center to house working homeless people, and establish areas where others could set up tents or built "tiny houses."



Ronald Vargas is the occupation's artist and makes many of the protest banners. He calls himself Ronald Reagan as a sarcastic comment.


Meanwhile, city politics have become very sharply divided, which is reflected in the current mayoral election. The city's progressive bloc, a minority on the city council, has two candidates for mayor. Council member Jesse Arreguin is more heavily favored and is the city's first Latino elected official, endorsed by local unions and Bernie Sanders. Fellow councilmember Kriss Worthington earned the loyalty of progressives by showing up on picket lines and at demonstrations for years.

Leading the conservative opposition is Laurie Capitelli, a real estate agent whose campaign is well funded by property owners and developers. By mid-October the "independent" National Association of Realtors PAC, having found a way around the city's $250 limit on direct campaign contributions, had channeled $60,382 into Capitelli campaign mailers.

Berkeley is one of many cities that have adopted ranked-choice voting in recent years. This helps the homeless political effort to reach out for allies. Arreguin and Worthington both ask supporters to vote for the other as their second choice in the ranked voting system. Now Lee has asked his constituency to vote for Arreguin as second choice, and Worthington as third choice. In this way, ranked choice voting allows people to support the political demands voiced by a candidate of homeless people, and then to support those progressive candidates who actually have the greatest chance of winning office.



After being forced by police to disband one camp on the grass median in the middle of Adeline Street, homeless community activists set up another across the street.


At the height of a recent rainstorm, Arreguin came out to check on the welfare of the people in the tents, which earned him Lee's support. Worthington has come by the occupations several times in the past. Ultimately, Arreguin says, the city needs to hear from homeless people themselves and treat them as normal members of the body politic. "We do have a crisis, and all options should be on the table," he said in an interview last year. "Berkeley should consider a temporary encampment until we have more permanent housing. People need a place to go."

There is no question but that homelessness is an issue in Berkeley's city election.  And while the presidential debates avoided it, homelessness has become a national issue as well. The explosion in the number of homeless people nationwide has led both to the passage of anti-homeless legislation in some cities and to the recognition of homeless encampments in others.  That explosion has not led yet to a broad movement for building public housing on a massive scale to eliminate homelessness.  But organized homeless people with a strong voice could help to create one.  Such a movement would depend as well on alliances with the broader communities in which homeless people live.



Mike Zint a leader of the homeless occupation, at an informal meeting outside his tent.


Media depictions often portray neighbors incensed over the presence of homeless people. The experience of the Poor Tour, however, is different. Residents of the mobile occupation have been careful to reach out to the neighborhoods that surround the camps. "We're very fortunate that we have the support of the community -- we wouldn't be able to pull off this tour without them," Zint says. "The city is so corrupt -- sniffing around the developers' money. It's time that the community figures out what's going on, stands up and fights back with us."

To keep their support, the camp has set basic rules. "This is a community, not a drug camp," Zint emphasizes. "We don't have a porta potty, but we still manage to be sanitary. No drugs or alcohol. Treat each other with fairness and respect. Be mindful of the neighbors because they're the ones we draw our support from."

The activists and their umbrella organization, First They Came for the Homeless, have a website and a Facebook page. James Cartmill, who lives in the tents, and Sarah Menefee, a long-time homeless rights activist who is a near-constant presence at the camp, have taken and posted hundreds of photographs showing camp life from the inside, and the confrontations with the police and city.



A homeless man sleeps across the street from the Post Office, where the homeless camp used to be. It is now an empty space surrounded by iron bars - the people who used to live there sleep on the grass or elsewhere.


The occupations are decorated with posters and banners created by Nicaraguan refugee Ronald Vargas Gonzalez, whose sarcastic camp nickname is Ronald Reagan, who was responsible for the "contra war" against Nicaragua's Sandinista government. "I use what I have inside me," he explains. "I analyze the society. I analyze being homeless. In each drawing I work to make society recognize that the homeless are human. Society says homeless means garbage, but homeless is human. Society has to give us respect."

Vargas credits the community he's found with fellow tent dwellers with keeping him alive. "The people here are like my roots, a connection to life. You can tell them everything - the good and the bad. What you've lost in this life, and what you've found."



After being expelled from the Post Office camp and Liberty City, many homeless people began living in Provo Park, across the street from City Hall. The police later dispersed the people here also.



Mike Lee and Mike Zint (in the tent) in the camp outside the Berkeley Post Office, originally established to protest the sale of the Main Post Office building. The Post Office Police demolished the camp and evicted the residents a few weeks after the photo was taken.

Friday, October 21, 2016

LATINOS ARE CHANGING THE POLITICS OF ... NEBRASKA!

LATINOS ARE CHANGING THE POLITICS OF ... NEBRASKA!
By David Bacon
The American Prospect, October 21, 2016
http://prospect.org/article/latino-immigrants-are-changing-politics-%E2%80%A6-nebraska




Isidro Rojas Garcia, an immigrant construction worker from Mexico, registers to vote for the first time after having been a U.S. citizen for 16 years. Helping him is Abby Kretz, senior organizer from the Heartland Workers Center.


If the winds of political change are starting to blow in Nebraska, the center of the storm is a third-floor office on 24th Street in South Omaha. There, huge maps of eight targeted precincts in Ward 4 line the walls of the Heartland Workers Center (HWC), covered in red dots for all the people organizers have spoken with over the past six months. Little stickers highlight the key issues in each neighborhood.

Every afternoon on weekdays, and all day on weekends, a row of reconditioned iPhones sits on a table next to clipboards holding signup lists and Spanish-language voter-education brochures. Rain or shine, young Latino organizers climb the stairs to pick up their packets and then fan out into the streets.

This is not an old-fashioned paper-based effort, though. Derek Ramirez, HWC's data cruncher, has loaded voter information derived from the Voter Activation Network database onto the iPhones. This allows precinct walkers to know house by house whom they're talking to, and to immediately input the information they receive-updating the office's database in real time.

"We do 20 houses a night, and I go to every house," says Lucero Aguilar, who was born in Campeche, Mexico. She's been an organizer here for two years. "Sometimes people don't open the door, but the last house I visit always opens to me. We have a good conversation and I get that person registered to vote. That's where the magic happens. I know the next day I'm going to try again."

Another organizer, Stephanie Zambrano, came to Omaha with her parents as a child from Guadalajara. "Community members get happy when they see youth knock on their doors, and want to talk with them," she says. "They're surprised we want to ask about housing or voting or issues in our community."

Zambrano came into the workers center after helping win a battle against Nebraska's former governor, Dave Heineman. Three years ago, Heineman ordered the state's Motor Vehicles Department to deny drivers' licenses to young people who gained temporary legal immigration status under President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Last year, the HWC, Young Nebraskans in Action, and other groups convinced state legislators to enact legislation overruling his order. "We have gained so much momentum," she enthuses. "It's getting out there so that we can make a difference."

As Zambrano senses, Latinos in Nebraska-many of them drawn to the area by the jobs in meatpacking plants-have the potential to shift the balance of political power. That shift is already starting in Omaha, but is also spreading through small towns throughout the state where immigration has changed population demographics.



Nebraska has three congressional districts, each of which has one electoral vote, given to the candidate winning the district plurality. Two other electoral votes are given to whichever party wins statewide. Obama won Omaha's Second Congressional District in 2008, and lost it in 2012. South Omaha, where fear of Donald Trump is palpable, may play a big role denying District 2's vote to Republicans this November. And beyond November, Nebraska's demographic shifts, combined with grassroots organization, may make longer-term political changes possible elsewhere as well.

Omaha's immigrants confront rising poverty and a history of exclusion, as well as an entrenched elite that has made the city one of the country's most corporate-dominated municipalities. Nevertheless, changing demographics are a fact of life here. Change is sweeping not just through Omaha, but also through small rural communities where meatpacking plants process the beef and pork for dinner tables across the country. The Heartland Workers Center's mission is to organize the potential created by this increasingly diverse population.



IN THE DECADES LEADING up to World War II, railroads and meatpacking plants made Omaha one of the most important industrial centers of the Midwest. Waves of European immigrants got jobs in the factories, and a Democratic political machine rose to power on their votes. In the 1930s, the city's meatpacking workers joined one of the most radical unions of the decade's labor upsurge, the United Packinghouse Workers. Black workers moving out of the South broke through color lines, and then used their power at work and in the union to fight discrimination in housing, bars, and employment.

Yet Omaha remains one of the country's most segregated cities. One census tract has a white concentration of 98.1 percent. In another in North Omaha, the city's black neighborhood, white residents make up only 5.9 percent. According to the 2010 Census, black residents are 13.7 percent of the population, while the Latino population, mostly in South Omaha, makes up 13.1 percent. "There's a clear delineation. There's North and South Omaha, then there's Omaha," commented one observer quoted by Patrick McNamara in his study "Collaborative Success and Community Culture."

At the top of the city's power structure sit representatives of large corporations.

At the top of the city's power structure sit representatives of large corporations. To counter the old Democratic machine, they organized the Knights of Aksarben (Nebraska spelled backwards) as early as 1895. Over the years, another corporate group, Heritage Services, has largely supplanted Aksarben, but the power of the Omaha elite has remained constant.

Omaha's most famous corporate figure is Warren Buffett, who founded the Berkshire Hathaway investment fund and made millionaires of those Omaha investors who got in early. Other corporate leaders have included Pieter Kiewit, founder of the construction giant that bears his name, and John Gottschalk, publisher of the Omaha World Herald. The inner core of power includes executives from Union Pacific Railroad, Mutual of Omaha, TD Ameritrade, Valmont Industries, Northern Natural Gas, and the America First Companies.

"We are a large small town," one observer told McNamara. "The power structure here knows each other and basically supports each other. We can call the mayor or governor and we'll actually get a call back." Said another, "Generally, over the years, the major community decisions have been made by people in the corporate sector, the Captains of Industry. It's the gang of six or ten or whatever."

The corporate elite has transformed the downtown, now brimming with office towers, condominiums and a redeveloped Old Market tourist mecca.  A suspension bridge for pedestrians spans the Missouri River from a sculpture-studded expanse on one side to a new stadium on the other.

Corporate domination has failed to transform the lives of Omaha's working-class families for the better, however. Hometown meat conglomerate ConAgra Foods was given acres of prime Missouri riverfront property for its corporate headquarters in the 1980s, along with large tax breaks. In 2015, it abandoned the city for Chicago's Merchandise Mart, eliminating 1,500 jobs.

Black poverty in Omaha averages 32 percent. Latino poverty isn't far behind, climbing from 20.4 percent to 27.6 percent in the last decade. Poverty among white families is less-8.6 percent-but even this is 66 percent higher than it was in 2000. Forty-two percent of the city's residents are renters, 11 percentage points higher than the national average.



BEFORE BEGINNING VOTER mobilization efforts, HWC organizers first assessed the impact of this economic structure in South Omaha neighborhoods. They began by analyzing census data, and then went out into the community to survey residents and look for leaders. They visited 2,306 homes, collected more than 600 surveys, and found almost 250 leaders.



Schuyler, Nebraska


At a community congress last November, they reported their results. Nearly half of the residents they spoke with reported that their households had to sacrifice on essentials, including utilities and food, in order to cover housing costs. A third said that at least one household member who could work was unemployed, and that they had no health insurance. Potholes and crime were concerns as well.

The main source of the poverty was "wages not adequate to cover housing expenses," the report stated, adding that "unemployment and underemployment likely contribute to this poverty." Latinos in South Omaha are concentrated in meatpacking, manufacturing, and construction. When the recession began in 2008, all three industries lost jobs. The Nebraska Department of Labor reports that meatpacking wages for those who were still in the plants in 2013 had fallen by 8 percent from wages three years earlier.

Meatpacking has been the magnet drawing Latinos to Omaha, and to Nebraska generally. Beginning in the 1970s, this industry was restructured with the development of boxed beef. Prior to that, animals were slaughtered in urban packinghouses by the then-giants Armour, Swift, Wilson, Cudahy, and others. Quarters of meat were shipped to markets, where skilled butchers cut them into pieces for consumers.

Companies like ConAgra changed that system drastically. After slaughter, animals are now cut apart on fast-moving disassembly lines, where an individual worker might cut out just one bone, hundreds of times a day. Boxes of meat sliced into consumer-sized chunks are then shipped to markets.

Corporations in the restructured industry built new plants in small rural towns, closer to the farms where animals are raised. To keep wages low, they brought in workers. "In the small towns where they located," says Lourdes Gouveia, retired sociology professor at the University of Nebraska in Omaha, "they created a whole new labor force." Companies sent recruiting teams to Los Angeles and other established immigrant communities, and even placed advertisements on radio stations along the Mexican border.

South Omaha's Latino community expanded as a result of this flow of migrant labor into the state. Today, foreign-born Latino immigrants make up a third of the total population of 32,362 in HWC's eight targeted precincts. About 10,261 people in the precincts are foreign-born Latinos, while more than 15,000 people speak Spanish at home, meaning that many Latino families now include children born here. The voter engagement project has registered about 1,500 people in Ward 4, and voter turnout here increased by 26 percent between 2010 and 2014.

Home for them now is here. That gives them a big motivation to become citizens and participate.

"Twenty or thirty years ago, when people first began arriving, they thought of home as their hometown in Mexico or Central America," says Sergio Sosa, HWC's executive director. "As they've had children, and as those children have grown, many people now see they're not going to return. Home for them now is here. That gives them a big motivation to become citizens and participate. Children born here are also getting old enough to vote now, so the voting population is growing."



SERGIO SOSA'S OBSERVATIONS APPLY to himself as well. Sosa was a church activist in Huehuetenango in Guatemala, a believer in liberation theology, at a time when radical priests organized movements for social change during that country's counterinsurgency war. He fell in love with a woman from Nebraska who worked in church programs in Guatemala, and together they eventually decided to come to the United States.

In South Omaha, Sosa was hired as an organizer for Omaha Together One Community by Father Damian Zuerlein, a priest at Guadalupe Church, just a stone's throw from the HWC office today. Together the pair spent a decade organizing the neighborhood's Mexican and Central American immigrants, and worked with the United Food and Commercial Workers to form unions in the city's meatpacking plants. In 2006, Sosa helped organize perhaps the largest march in Omaha's history, when more than 20,000 Latinos filled the streets to protest immigration raids and call for pro-immigrant reform.



Sergio Sosa, the executive director of the Heartland Workers Center, and Lucia Pedroza, HWC senior organizer


"After the march, the leaders I'd been working with asked me to help them become a more permanent organization," he remembers. "They promised they'd raise the money to pay my salary, and together we set up the Heartland Workers Center." The center today has a health and safety training institute, educates workers about their labor rights, and advocates for better labor and immigration laws.

When Sosa and senior organizer Abbie Kretz began developing a strategy for turning demographic change into political power, the center's funders were skeptical. The duo went to the organization's leadership base. Workers committed themselves to raising the first $3,000 to develop a civic engagement program based in the immigrant community of South Omaha.

Over time, they've convinced funders and local political leaders that greater political power for Latinos will have an impact. "The population of eligible Latino voters is growing year by year," says Heath Mello, senator for South Omaha in Nebraska's unicameral legislature and now candidate for mayor in 2017. "In the last election cycle we really saw that they're engaging people using the model, 'I vote for my family.'"

"Nebraska is the only red state that stopped a voter-ID bill twice, in the post-Arizona, show-your-papers period," Mello says.

That influence has been growing for several years. "Nebraska is the only red state that stopped a voter-ID bill twice, in the post-Arizona, show-your-papers period," Mello says. "Once we defeated the dog-whistle politics, we set the stage for the DACA drivers' license bill." In Nebraska's Republican-majority legislature, "we have people who want a more welcoming state, who believe in social justice. But this changing dynamic creates a political force so strong that other officeholders have to engage as well."

The Sherwood Foundation, headed by Warren Buffett's daughter Susan Buffett, has funded the Heartland Workers Center for seven years. "We've seen what happened when they came together on the DACA bill," says Kristin Williams, the foundation's director for community initiatives. "We didn't have to take the baby steps-the young people were a force to be reckoned with.  If this continues, Latinos will have a place at the table."

Sherwood also funds the Office of Latino and Latin American Studies (OLLAS) at the Omaha campus of the University of Nebraska, founded by Gouveia. Today, its director is Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado, son of California farm workers. Under Benjamin-Alvarado's leadership, OLLAS has become a primary source of the young Latino organizers who walk the South Omaha precincts, as well as a think tank for the research base of HWC's strategy. "The two [HWC and OLLAS] together are a powerhouse," Williams asserts.

          

FOUR YEARS AGO, HWC ORGANIZER Abbie Kretz went back to her hometown, Schuyler, a small meatpacking town an hour west of Omaha. There, she and Sosa began pulling together Latino community activists. From their meetings emerged the Comite Latino.

When the Cargill beef plant opened in Schuyler several decades ago, it processed fewer than 2,500 animals per day. Over the years, production has more than doubled to 5,500, and the town's population has increased accordingly. Today, 70 percent of Schuyler's roughly 7,000 residents are Latino. The same demographic change has transformed rural meatpacking towns throughout Nebraska-Lexington, Grand Island, Madison, and many others. The Comite Latino and the changes it has brought to Schuyler, therefore, portend transformations far beyond Schuyler's borders.

The town's changes began long before Kretz's return home. Twenty-one years ago, Victor Lopez came from Mexico and got a job in the local plant. In 2006, he helped organize one of the immigrant marches that swept across the country. In Schuyler, it drew 3,000 people-a remarkable turnout for so small a town. Today, Lopez heads the Comite Latino, and owns a small auto repair shop.

"People here aren't really immigrants anymore," he says, "and their children certainly aren't. Our purpose, therefore, is to try to open their eyes about their rights, and urge them to look out for their own needs. If you think you're going back home, you have no interest in the things that affect you here. But we're in Schuyler now, and not going back. So what we're looking for is equality, to integrate our people into the community, and make people respect us. We want to feel like we belong."

Part of that equation is voting. When the Comite began in 2013, the town had 900 Latinos eligible to vote, but only 14 actually voted. Within one election cycle, they got the number up to 136. Now, there are two Latino candidates running this November, one for city council and one, Mynor Hernandez, for the Colfax County School Board.

Hernandez came to Schuyler to go to high school in 1996, and now is the Comite's fulltime staff. One of the group's first efforts was to convince the school district to set up a dual-language program. "Kids that go to it are better off in the long term and more of them go to college," he asserts. "In our country as a whole, if you speak two languages, you open a lot of doors."

In the coming election, the Comite is also informing Latino voters about the local state Senate race. The incumbent, a Republican, nevertheless voted for the DACA drivers' license bill. A more conservative Tea Party Republican opposes him (the Nebraska legislature is formally nonpartisan, which creates many Republican-versus-Republican contests), with the support of Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts, former chief operating officer of TD Ameritrade. Ricketts vetoed the DACA bill, intended to overturn previous Governor Heineman's ban on drivers' licenses for young immigrants. The legislature then voted to override Ricketts's veto. The Comite collected petition signatures to support drivers' licenses for DACA recipients. "It's important for our people to know who's running and what they stand for," Hernandez says.



Schuyler, Nebraska


Donald Trump's presidential candidacy has scared Schuyler's (and Nebraska's) Latinos, particularly because of his threat to deport all undocumented immigrants. Many meatpacking workers still have no legal immigration status. Although the undocumented population fell nationally in the aftermath of the 2008 recession, in Nebraska it increased. Hernandez tells the story of his son's white friend: "He went home and told his mom, 'Don't vote for Trump-he wants to deport all my friends!'"

"But people are still afraid here," Lopez cautions. "They feel uncertain about what will happen to them. They don't buy a house or a car, and sometimes don't even go to school, because they have to give information and feel vulnerable. They drive because they have to get to work, but can't get a license and are terrified they'll be stopped. Our plan is to try to help get people legal status where we can, and support reform legislation."

Kretz is now starting a new effort, this time in Nebraska City, another meatpacking town near Omaha. On one recent night, she helped a local resident register to vote. Sixteen years after becoming a citizen, he registered just to be able to vote against Trump.

But when people register and get involved, their motivation is often fear of the political climate in the current campaign.

Kretz and HWC organizers are careful not to campaign for or against candidates, which would jeopardize the organization's tax status. But when people register and get involved, their motivation is often fear of the political climate in the current campaign. "Many young people, and even whole families, register because of the hate they've seen," Sosa says. "People fear they'll wake up the day after the election and their families will be separated by mass deportations."

Nebraska City's nascent committee is mostly Guatemalan, so convincing people to get active faces another barrier as well. "In Guatemala, the war is supposedly over, but there's still a lot of violence," one committee member says. "There are often threats by people involved in politics, that something bad will happen to you if you don't vote the right way. Here, there is fear, too, although not at the same level. There's a lot of disinformation. People don't understand the process or even know they have to register in order to be able to vote."

Carolina Padilla, executive director of Omaha's Intercultural Senior Center, is another Guatemalan immigrant who finds the same reaction. "We come from countries where political participation doesn't exist because of the corruption, so people wonder what the point of participation is here as well," she explains. "The person with the money will always win. It's hard for the older generation to change, but now we have a new generation. They're saying, we want to participate and our vote counts."

          

LUCIA PEDROZA, HWC'S other senior organizer, belongs to this new generation. She was born in Guatemala, and remembers when her mother, who'd gone to work in the United States, was deported back home. Later, her mother returned to the United States and sent for Lucia and her sister Gaby, who were then 12 and 10 years old. Her story of crossing the border as a child recalls those of the unaccompanied Central American children who've made headlines arriving in the United States in the last three years.

Pedroza's uncle took her through Mexico and sent her off with a group crossing the border at Nuevo Laredo. "I had my Bible with me, and I thought, I have faith," she remembers. "They took us to a part of the desert, and at night we all began to walk. I thought it would only be a couple of hours, but we walked all night. We were going to see my mom, so we packed our favorite clothes. You're supposed to have dark clothes that aren't visible, but Gaby wore her best bright white pants in the middle of the desert. The group had to huddle around to hide her, but there was a sense of unity, that they had to protect the kids. After walking, we had to cross the river, and took off our clothes to wade through the water.  One of my shoes was swept away, and a lady gave me hers.  Then we had to run, and at the end her feet were all cut up. But we were so glad we made it!"

Pedroza went on to high school and college, and during one summer her father got her a job in a meatpacking plant. "I'd never worked in a job like that, but I learned," she laughs. "I worked on the kill side, packing intestines, starting at six in the morning and working till six at night." Later she worked for two years in another plant. "I was pregnant and it was hard, but I had to keep on working. I had to make a living. It was a union plant, though, so we were treated a little better. After that I worked in other plants too."

When Pedroza looks at the young organizers coming into the HWC office from university campuses, she knows that almost all of their families share the same work and migration experience. "It's important for them to understand it and know what people are going through," she says, "even if they haven't lived it themselves."

It took Pedroza some time before she was able to get her legal residence status, and now she plans to become a citizen. "But whether we're undocumented, resident, or citizen, the main thing is that we're all human. We all have the power to do something great if we stick together and work collectively."

Since becoming a fulltime organizer two years ago, "our work has changed our whole state," she declares. "Our purpose is to build a community that works for all, even though now it only works for some. In five years we could have better schools, better homes, better jobs, and better streets. It depends on who we elect, and on people staying engaged beyond election time. We don't really understand how the system functions yet, how money is distributed. We have to have a better education on how things work. But we cannot disconnect ourselves. Everything is related, and we're all affected by everything we do."

Monday, October 3, 2016

FARM WORKERS WIN A WATERSHED ELECTION IN WASHINGTON STATE

FARM WORKERS WIN A WATERSHED ELECTION IN WASHINGTON STATE
By David Bacon
The Nation, 10/3/16
https://www.thenation.com/article/why-these-farm-workers-went-on-strike-and-why-it-matters/


The children of migrant farm workers and their supporters march to the processing plant at Sakuma Brothers Farms


Burlington, WA-There is not much love lost between the owners of Sakuma Brothers Farms and Ramon Torres, the president of Familias Unidas por la Justicia. Sakuma Brothers is one of the largest berry growers in Washington state, and Familias Unidas is a grassroots union organized by the company's workers. Torres used to work in the Sakuma fields. He was fired after the strikes by pickers in 2013 in which the union was formed.

This month, on September 12, the workers finally voted in an election to demonstrate what really needed no proof - that they supported the union they formed three years ago. This election is a watershed: Familias Unidas por la Justicia is the first union organized by farm workers in the United States in many years.

The balloting took place over four hours at the company office, two hours north of Seattle, surrounded by Sakuma's blueberry fields. After all the votes had been cast, Torres and a small group of workers and supporters drove over to the polling place to watch the count. A company manager balked, however. The ever.  The count couldn't take place as long as Torres was on the property, he said.

After a lot of arguing, the workers retired to a local schoolyard, together with Richard Ahearn, former regional director of the National Labor Relations Board. There, on the tailgate of a pickup belonging to State Senator John McCoy, Ahearn counted the ballots. The result: 195 for the union, and 58 against.

Jeff Johnson, who heads the Washington State Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, was part of the workers' group.  "The irony of where the votes were tallied was hard to miss," he said later. "The majority of students at that elementary school are Latino, Senator McCoy has been a fierce advocate for these workers, and this is as much a public victory as a union victory."

The union is a grassroots organization formed by the pickers themselves, and is led by indigenous Mixtec and Triqui migrants from the southern Mexico states of Oaxaca, Guerrero and Chiapas. A union contract at Sakuma Brothers could give this union the stability and resources needed to make substantial changes in the economic conditions of its own members, and of farm workers across western Washington.

Strikes and organizing among agricultural laborers, especially indigenous migrants, has been on the rise all along the Pacific coast over the last several years.  The election in Burlington and a new contract will further raise the expectations of thousands of people working in the fields, from northern Mexico to the Canadian border.  "This is a new dawn," Torres said. "When we were celebrating afterwards, people began saying, 'From now on we know what the future of our children is going to be.'"



Ramon Torres, president of Familias Unidas por la Justicia


The union in Burlington won the loyalty of the Sakuma workforce through three picking seasons of strikes and direct action. Almost all of the work stoppages challenged the company over low wages and its methods for calculating the piece rate, in which workers are paid according to the quantity of fruit they pick. Before he was fired in 2013, Torres was chosen by workers as their spokesperson while attempting to set what they considered fair rate: one that would guarantee $14 per hour.

"Last year they were paying $10 an hour, which they say is a lot," said Familias Unidas vice-president Felimon Pineda, a Mixtec picker and former Sakuma employee. "But they demanded fifty pounds per hour to get $10. For five pounds more there was a bonus of $1.50, or $11.50 an hour. Only the workers who work fast could get that, though." When workers walked out to protest, supervisors called the police to expel Pineda from the field.

When the season began this year in June, workers walked out over a piece rate of 24 cents per pound for picking strawberries. In August, FUJ members in Sakuma blueberry fields walked out again. A day earlier, workers explained, management was paying 60 cents per pound, and then lowered the price to 56 cents.

During all the walkouts, workers also demanded that Sakuma sign a union contract.

"People are tired of low pay," Torres said, "but that's not all of it. Many come up from California for the harvest, getting here broke with no guarantee they'll get a room in the labor camp, and the conditions are bad there anyway. People feel humiliated, and denied basic respect."

A 35-member union committee of workers in the field organized the walk-outs. In addition, the union has another 25-member committee shaping anger over conditions into proposals for a union contract.

In 2013, Sakuma's owners seemed willing to negotiate with the workers, but when those talks failed to raise piece rates, the new union launched a boycott of the company's berries. The boycott initially focused on local sales under Sakuma Brothers' own label. But soon the workers discovered that Sakuma was selling berries through one of the largest agricultural marketers in the country, Driscoll Strawberry Associates, or Driscoll's.

Driscoll's is the largest berry distributor in the world. It does not grow its own berries, but controls berry production by contracted farmers. It has contracted growers in several countries, and has received loans guaranteeing foreign investment from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, a U.S. government agency.



Farm workers and their supporters march to the office of Sakuma Farms


Marketing berries has become highly monopolized. Four shippers control one-third of all blueberry shipments in the United States. During the peak season, Driscoll's moves 3.8 million pounds of fruit daily, and up to 80 percent of the fruit is shipped on the same day it's received from growers. Sakuma Brothers has been supplying berries to Driscoll's for 25 years.

An extremely positive company profile on the front page of the business section of The New York Times the day before the Sakuma election (and which did not mention the boycott, the election, labor strife, or even the farm workers themselves who produce Driscoll's berries) announced Driscoll's new national marketing campaign. While the company wouldn't tell the Times how much it was spending, the article estimated that similar campaigns spend $10-20 million on advertising.

"The public will get an introduction to the people Driscoll's calls its Joy Makers-agronomists, breeders, sensory analysts, plant pathologists and entomologists who will explain how the company creates its berries," the article enthused.

Rosalinda Guillen, director of Community2Community, a farm worker cooperative and advocacy organization in Bellingham, says Driscoll's image burnishing actually made it more vulnerable to a boycott. "It made the company more exposed, because of the way it markets itself," she explained. Guillen started helping farm workers organize unions in Washington over two decades ago, and spent several years with the United Farm Workers in California. When the strikes first erupted at Sakuma Brothers in 2013, workers called her in to help plan strategy and organize support.

Starting in the area between Seattle and Burlington, the workers urged students and progressive community activists to set up boycott committees and begin picketing supermarkets, and asked shoppers not to buy Driscoll's berries. As that activity increased, Torres and several workers and supporters made a trip down the west coast this spring, setting up more committees as they went.

"I wouldn't say (the boycott) is threatening the survival of the farm. I would say it's an annoyance," Sakuma spokesman Roger van Oosten claimed earlier this year. Maybe so, but the company started to feel the effects of labor pressure. It had to give $87,160 in retroactive pay to pickers who worked in 2014, after a court ruled piece-rate workers must be paid separately for ten-minute rest breaks. And in a 2013 class-action lawsuit brought by two Sakuma workers alleging pay violations, Sakuma settled out of court by paying 408 workers $500,000 and their lawyers $350,000.

Driscoll's image also took a hit after a strike organized by pickers in the San Quintin Valley of Baja California in 2015, when as many as 60,000 farm workers stopped work and confronted heavy police repression. Last year these workers also decided to organize an independent union, and announced their support for a Driscoll's boycott. The area's largest grower, BerryMex, is owned by the Reiter family, which also owns Driscoll's.



Felimon Piñeda, vice-president of Familias Unidas por la Justicia, speaks to farm workers and their supporters in front of the office of Sakuma Farms.


Sakuma Farms and BerryMex aren't just connected by a common distributor, Driscoll's, but by the workforce that picks the berries. Agricultural labor in virtually all the berry fields on the Pacific Coast comes from the stream of indigenous migrants from southern Mexico.

"We are all part of a movement of indigenous people," Pineda says. "In San Quentin the majority of people are indigenous, and speak Mixteco, Zapoteco, Triqui, and Nahuatl. Their strike movement is indigenous. Everyone involved in our union in Washington is indigenous also."

As a result, the movement of workers is as much a protest against anti-indigenous racism as it is about low wages. "No matter if you're from Guatemala or Honduras, Chiapas or Guerrero - the right to be human is for everyone," Pineda added. "But sometimes people see us as being very low. They think we have no rights. They're wrong. The right to be human is the same. There should be respect for all."

In Guillen's view, "indigenous culture plays a huge role, especially people's collective decision-making process. The strong bonds of culture and language create an ability for the union to grow stronger." Workers were also hardened, she believes, by the strikes. "The strikes were the only way to present the company with their grievances," she explained, "and gave farm workers the sense that by acting together with community support they could actually win something. New workers joined in every time. A few people got fired, but they didn't fall away, and kept supporting the organization."

In May this upsurge among indigenous farm workers erupted in California as well. Over 400 farm workers in McFarland, in the San Joaquin Valley, walked out of the fields at another grower protesting low wages and company abuse. The farm's owner, the Klein Management Company, produces clamshell boxes of blueberries sold under the Gourmet Trading Company label.

"The majority of the people here are from Oaxaca-Mixtecos and Zapotecos," explained Paulino Morelos, who comes from Putla, a town in Oaxaca. At the beginning of the blueberry-picking season in April, the company was paying pickers 95 cents per pound. By mid-May, the price had dropped to 70 cents, and then 65 cents. Finally, the company announced it was dropping it again, to 60 cents. Workers refused to go in to pick. After leaving the fields, workers approached the United Farm Workers, which filed a petition for a union election. The union won by a vote of 347 to 68.

Winning an election is one thing, but negotiating a contract is another. Familias Unidas por la Justicia called off their boycott when Sakuma Brothers agreed to an election followed by negotiations. But the boycott threat is still a powerful motive for reaching agreement.



After a march by migrant farm workers and their supporters march to the processing plant at Sakuma Brothers Farms, Washington State Labor Federation leader Jeff Johnson and a delegation including Brown Berets attempted to meet with the company, leaving them a written message when managers refused to talk with them.


The union and Sakuma also settled on a mechanism for making a contract even more likely. According to the AFL-CIO's Jeff Johnson, "the memorandum of agreement negotiated by labor attorney Kathy Barnard has a date certain for the conclusion of bargaining, after which if an agreement isn't reached, the offers will be submitted to arbitration, with the arbiter choosing one proposal to prevail."

California has a law, called mandatory mediation, with virtually the same arrangement. Signed into law in 2002, it has been used by the UFW to get contracts at several large companies. This law, however, is now on appeal before the state's Supreme Court, challenged by Gerawan Farms in Fresno, one of the world's largest peach growers.

"But the first place we had any arrangement like that was here in Washington, even before California," Guillen says.  She and other organizers came up with it to help workers win a contract at Washington's largest wine company, Chateau St. Michelle.  That contract was signed in 1995, and is still in force today.

The AFL-CIO's Jeff Johnson welcomed Familias Unidas into the Washington State Labor Federation last year, which helped gain the cooperation of Richard Ahearn in administering the election.  As a retired director of the National Labor Relations Board, his participation highlighted another irony.  Farm workers (along with domestic workers) were excluded from the National Labor Relations Act in 1937, which set up the union election process for other workers.  California is still the only state with a law establishing such a process for farm worker unions (and recently passed a law ending the exclusion of farm workers from the overtime rights other workers have as well). 

Torres, Pineda, Guillen and the FUJ workers all expect that their movement will move beyond Sakuma Brothers. "We already have members in other ranches," Torres said, "who want the same things we do."

At the same time, however, growers are increasingly searching for a low wage workforce impervious to unionization, through the expansion of guest worker programs.  Sakuma Brothers itself tried this tactic in 2013 and 2014.  In 2013 the company brought about 70 migrants to the U.S. under H2-A work visas.  This Federal program allows growers to recruit workers outside the country for periods of less than a year, after which the workers must return to their country of origin. 

Guest workers who lose their jobs by offending their employer or not working fast enough have to leave the country.  That makes joining a union or protesting conditions extremely risky for them.  Growers can only use the program, however, if they can claim they can't find local workers. 



Migrant farm workers and their supporters, members of the union Familias Unidas por la Justicia, march to the processing plant at Sakuma Brothers Farms


After the 2013 strikes, Sakuma sent strikers form letters saying they'd been fired for not working, and then told the U.S. Department of Labor it couldn't find any local workers.  It applied for H2A work visas for 468 guest workers, enough to replace its entire workforce.  Strikers all signed letters to DoL saying they were willing to work, and the company eventually had to withdraw its application. 

While Sakuma Farms gave up its guest worker plan, at least for the moment, other agricultural employers in Washington have increased the number of H2A workers drastically.  The Washington Farm Labor Association, according to Alex Galarza of the Northwest Justice Project, brought in about 2000 workers in 2006.  In 2013, the year FUJ was formed, the number rose to 4000.  Last year it exploded to 11,000, and may reach 16,000 for 2016.

Almost all the migrant workers who make up Familias Unidas have been living in the U.S. for many years, however. They cannot go back to Mexico, or cross the border to return to the U.S. They are at the northern end of a migrant journey that took many, like Pineda, through San Quintin or the other agricultural valleys of northern Mexico years ago. About half live in California, and come to Washington for the harvest every year. But Pineda and an increasing number are settling in Washington for good.

Organizing the union at Sakuma Brothers is part of putting down roots in northern Washington. "This is the end of the road for them," Guillen explains. "There's no place else to go. Workers won this election because they know what they want. They have families here, and are looking for a better future for their kids. It's not a temporary job for them. They're part of this community."



Rosalinda Guillen, director of Community2Community, speaks at a press conference at the office of Sakuma Farms.  With her are Benito Lopez, a member of the union committee of Familias Unidas por la Justicia, with his wife Juana Sanchez, and Tomas Ramon, another committee member.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

NO OTHER WAY THAN TO STRUGGLE - NO HAY OTRO CAMINO, MAS QUE LUCHAR

NO OTHER WAY THAN TO STRUGGLE:
The Farmworker-Led Boycott of Driscoll's Berries
By Felimon Piñeda interviewed by David Bacon,
Truthout | Interview, Wednesday, 31 August 2016
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/37429-no-other-way-than-to-struggle-the-farmworker-led-boycott-of-driscoll-s-berries

Sigue en Español





Felimon Piñeda sits with his children. (Photo: David Bacon)


Felimon Piñeda is vice president of Familias Unidas por la Justicia, the independent farm workers union in Washington State. He was one of the original strikers when the union was organized in 2013. The union, together with the union of striking farm workers in Baja California, Mexico, has organized a boycott of Driscoll's Berries, the world's largest berry company. They demand that Driscoll's take responsibility for the conditions and violations of labor rights by the growers whose berries they sell. Piñeda describes the life of a farm worker producing Driscoll's berries, and his own history that brought him into the fields of Washington State. He told his story to David Bacon during an interview in Linden, Washington.

Our town in Oaxaca is Jicaral Coicoyan de las Flores. We speak Mixteco Bajo. I am 33 years old, but I left at a very young age. In 1996 I got to San Quintin [in Baja California] with my older brother. After four nights in Punta Colonet, we found a place to stay in a camp. There were a lot of cabins for people and we stayed there for six months. We planned to go back to Oaxaca afterwards, but when we'd been there for six months we had no money. We were all working -- me, my sister, my older brother and his wife and two kids -- but we'd all pick tomatoes and cucumbers just to have something to eat. There was no bathroom then. People would go to the bathroom out in the tomatoes and chiles. The children too.

Another man living there, who spoke another dialect of Mixteco, rented us a little house. It was one room, very small. We were there a year. We were getting home at five in the evening and the children were all eating their food cold because we couldn't make the stove work. Then my brother said we should buy a plot between all of us, to give us a place to live. So we paid one payment, and then another. My brother is still living there, and his children are grown up now. His oldest son is 22 or 23. My niece now has kids.

In Punta Colonet life was very hard. Work was always badly paid. You had to work a lot for very little. In 1996 the wage was 45 pesos. In 2002 I worked three months there again, and in 2005 I worked almost a year. The bosses paid about 100 pesos. But the food was cheaper then. Maseca [corn flour] cost 55 [pesos]. We were not living well, but earning enough to afford it. A soda then cost five pesos. Now it costs 12 pesos.



Felimon Piñeda and his wife in their room in the labor camp at Sakuma Farms, during the strike in 2013. (Photo: David Bacon)


I lived in Punta Colonet two years, and then, because of our great need, I had to begin coming to the US. I worked in the tomatoes in Florida, where it was very hot. It was very hard work, because they have a trailer for the tomatoes, and I'm short. You have to lift the bucket full of tomatoes to about nine feet. The person on the trailer grabs it and empties it, and then hands it back. I couldn't do it, and I had to stand on something, and the bucket weighs more than 30 pounds. It was very hard, and I did that work for a year-and-a-half. In San Quintin I picked tomatoes too, but it wasn't as hard.

Recently, we've seen the movement grow in San Quintin -- the Alianza de Organizaciones Nacional Estatal y Municipal por la Justicia Social. They're defending the people. To me, it's very important that there's someone willing to defend people. The political parties aren't interested in what's happening to us at work. I don't know how the Alianza got started, but I hear they're suffering a lot from threats by the companies, threats from the government. The rich and the bosses have bought the government. They pay the police, who then shoot at the people. It doesn't matter if they're women or children. That's the worst thing I've seen in the San Quintin Valley.

At some point in the future, I'll be going back to Mexico. With the threats they received, that could affect me too. For that reason I'm very grateful for the movement they've organized. For my part, I want to send my greetings to all the leaders in San Quintin. In 2013 Sakuma Brothers here in Washington state threatened us also, because of the movement we organized. They threatened us with the police and hired consultants and guards. Their purpose was to get rid of our union. Thanks to the union we've organized here, Familias Unidas por la Justicia, we stayed firm, and the company wasn't able to get rid of us. We continue to struggle.

That's why I'm so interested in the struggle going on in the San Quintin Valley. When I heard they'd gone out on strike I spoke with my brother and asked him for the phone number of the radio station there. Then I spoke with them and got the number of Bonifacio Martinez from the Alianza, so that we could communicate with the leaders.




Felimon Piñeda talks to workers and supporters, at the end of the march to Sakuma Farms offices in 2015. (Photo: David Bacon)


It seems they arrived at an agreement on the wages. But after they got an answer from the government last year, I understand that the governor went back on his word, and so did the bosses. So then they started a boycott of Driscoll's, the company that distributes a lot of berries from San Quintin. It's been hard to keep in communication, but we haven't lost touch.

They know something of our struggle here in Washington state. Our movement started on July 11 in 2013, the first day of our strike at Sakuma Farms. Sometimes the struggle has been very hard. Sometimes we feel tired. But then we recover our strength and we continue. And we continue with the help of a lot of unions, reporters, supporters of the boycott. And we're making progress.

In 2013, at one point, we were negotiating with the company to improve the working conditions for all the workers at Sakuma Brothers. Sakuma signed an agreement and said he'd respect it, but after two weeks he broke it. That was when we started our boycott, and it is growing every day. Sakuma sends his fruit to Driscoll's in Watsonville. In 2013 I said to the compañeros that we had to go to Watsonville to bring our boycott there. I thought that if Driscoll's saw the people there it would put more pressure on the company.

The boycott kept growing and Driscoll's felt the pressure. Finally the company called one of our supporters and said they wanted to talk about how to get the boycott stopped. She said they had to talk with us. So last year on May 8 we went to Driscoll's office in Watsonville. I thought their warehouse would be small, but there were two very big buildings. Everything there was Driscoll's.




The children of farm workers at Sakuma Farms hold signs during a march to the company offices in 2016. (Photo: David Bacon)


We started to talk about why the boycott started. At the beginning they put a big bowl on the table with strawberries, blueberries, raspberries and blackberries. They offered them to us and asked us to try some. We said, how can we try some if we're boycotting them?

We were there almost a day. They said they couldn't force Sakuma to sign a contract. We said, OK, the boycott will continue until we get a union contract. This year Sakuma has said he wants to negotiate with us, but we'll see what happens. Sakuma now has a gringo who works with them who's supposed to be good at working in places where there are collective demands and problems.

Last year they were paying $10 an hour, which they say is a lot. But although they pay by the hour, they demand 50 pounds per hour to get $10. For 5 pounds more there's a bonus of 1.50, or 11.50 an hour. But only the workers who work fast can get that.... Since 2013 the weekly pay has actually gone down, in both strawberries and blueberries. Both last year and this year the people have walked out on strike because they didn't agree with the wages.

When the workers struck last year, even though I was working at another company I went out there. I didn't want to leave the Mixtec people by themselves -- they're my people and they chose me as vice president of the union. I had to travel from far away to get there, but there were still about 250 people waiting for me. People said we had to do something, so we went to a field where people were still working. Those workers said the pay was no good, and they left the field too.



Farm workers and supporters demand a contract.  (Photo: David Bacon)


When we demanded a collective bargaining agreement the supervisors said they wouldn't discuss it. Then they sent in the police. The police asked to talk with me, and said I wasn't working there. Alfredo Juarez from our comité [committee] said I had a right to be there because I was the union vice president. The police said they were going to arrest me. So the people asked, are you going to arrest us all? The police didn't know what to say.

Finally the police said that if we didn't move out of the field, into a public place, they'd have to do what they came there for. So the people said, OK, and we all left the field and went to the Costco supermarket in Burlington to demonstrate for the boycott. The next day the company bought burritos for everyone at work.

This year there have been more strikes like this, and more boycott demonstrations. That's why the company says now it wants to negotiate with us.

Talking to Bonifacio, I asked them to do a boycott also -- us in the north and them in the south. That way we'd put more pressure on Driscoll's. We talk about the tactics we use and I told him about our history. He said Driscoll's and the Alianza had to go to the government to ask that the wages get raised. I think that's no good. The government has its role, but Driscoll's has to talk with its growers, like BerryMex, and ensure that they're paying the workers well. That's what we told Driscoll's. We're not going to stop the boycott until the day we sign a contract at Sakuma. Same with Driscoll's and BerryMex.



Adela Estrada Ortiz picks blueberries in a field near Burlington, Washington. (Photo: David Bacon)


I think the idea of an independent union in San Quintin is the best way to do it, with a direct contract. The farm workers of San Quintin have been suffering for over 20 years. Hunger wages are the reason why the people went on strike. They're doing a very good thing. But I think it's better to sign a collective agreement with the companies. The government is not the owner of the farms. Better to force the bosses to pay. They're millionaires. The companies have the main responsibility to pay the workers well. We are demanding the same things both here and there, and the company is the same, Driscoll's.

Last year they invited me to speak on the radio in San Quintin by telephone, so everyone in San Quintin could hear about us. I wanted to tell people to get involved in the movement. It's good for everyone. The strike is the best way to get a fair wage. I wanted to tell people not to get discouraged, that in Washington state we're struggling too. But then the people at the radio station said they weren't authorized, and they wouldn't let me speak.

People in Santa Maria and Madera in California are supporting us too. Many of them come up to Washington in the berry season, and are working at Sakuma right now. They are members of Familias Unidas. I don't know if people are also thinking about striking in California. In Greenfield, in the Salinas Valley in California, there are a lot of people from the Triqui region, and they organize a lot of movements. They're very militant. Maybe they will organize a movement there. It would be wonderful if they would.

We are all part of a movement of Indigenous people. In San Quintin the majority of people are Indigenous. On the radio there they speak Mixteco, Zapoteco, Triqui and Nahuatl. Their strike movement is Indigenous. Everyone involved in our union in Washington is Indigenous also.



Ricardo, an immigrant from Putla, Oaxaca, prunes blackberry vines to allow more light to get to the fruit, and to allow pickers to move down the rows more easily. (Photo: David Bacon)


Here Indigenous people are really worried about getting fired. The supervisors and foremen shout at them and push them hard. They abuse Indigenous workers more than any others. It's the same here and in Baja California. What we want is respect for everyone. No matter if you're from Guatemala or Honduras, Chiapas or Guerrero. The right to be human is for everyone. But sometimes people see us as being very low. They think we have no rights. But they're wrong. The right to be human is the same. There should be respect for all.

When we were on strike in 2013, many of us didn't speak Spanish well. Some of the young people at work would say, "These people don't know how to talk. They don't know what they're doing." The supervisors would say that too. Then, a year later, we won a legal suit to force Sakuma to pay us for our break time. We won over $800,000. After that the people who didn't want to have anything to do with us began wanting to talk with us. The boys who were making fun of us started coming around because they wanted money.

There is more anger now. People believe that they shouldn't be living in bad conditions, people shouldn't be mistreated. More people are defending their rights. A lot of new people coming from California are already with us. They have a good way of thinking. If we don't fight for ourselves, who's going to fight for us? If the bosses want to trample on us, if the government and the police don't like us, there's no other way than to struggle.


NO HAY OTRO CAMINO, MAS QUE LUCHAR
Entrevista con Filemón Pineda, vicepresidente de Familias Unidas por la Justicia, Por David Bacon

Nuestro pueblo en Oaxaca es Jicaral Cocoyán de las Flores. Hablamos mixteco bajo. Tengo 33 años de edad, pero salí del pueblo muy joven. En 1996 llegué a San Quintín con mi hermano mayor. Después de cuatro noches en Punta Colonet, encontramos un lugar para alojarnos en un campamento. Había un montón de cuartos para los jornaleros y permanecimos allí seis meses. Teníamos planeado regresar a Oaxaca, pero transcurridos esos seis meses no teníamos dinero. Todos trabajábamos -yo, mi hermana, mi hermano mayor y su esposa y dos hijos-. Pero la cosecha de tomates y pepinos apenas alcanzaba para tener algo para comer. No había baño allí. La gente hacía sus necesidades afuera, en los campos de tomates y chiles. Los niños también.

Otro hombre que vivía allí, que hablaba en otra lengua mixteca, nos alquiló una pequeña casa. Era una habitación, muy pequeña. Estuvimos allí un año. Regresábamos de trabajar a las cinco de la tarde y los niños comían entonces sus alimentos fríos, pues no había forma de calendar en la estufa. Entonces mi hermano dijo que debíamos comprar una parcela entre todos nosotros, para darnos un lugar para vivir. Así que hicimos un pago y luego otro. Mi hermano sigue viviendo allí, y sus hijos crecieron. El mayor tiene 22 o 23 años. Mi sobrina ahora es mamá.

En Punta Colonet la vida era muy dura. El trabajo fue siempre mal pagado. Había que trabajar mucho por muy poco. En 1996 el salario era de 45 pesos. En 2002 trabajé tres meses allí de nuevo, y en 2005 trabajé casi un año. Los patrones pagaban entonces alrededor de 100 pesos. Pero también entonces la comida era más barata. Las tortillas costaban 5.50 pesos el kilo. No estábamos viviendo bien, pero ganábamos lo suficiente para pagar los alimentos. En el trabajo un refresco nos costaba cinco pesos. Ahora cuesta 12.

Viví en Punta Colonet dos años, y luego, debido a nuestra gran necesidad, tuve que empezar a venir a Estados Unidos. Trabajé en los tomates en Florida, donde hace mucho calor. Era un trabajo muy duro, porque tienen un trailer para los tomates, y yo soy chaparrito. Uno tiene que levantar la cubeta llena de tomates a más de dos metros y medio. Una persona en el trailer la agarra y la vacía, y luego la devuelve. No podía yo elevar la cubeta y tenía que subirme en algún banco, y la cubeta pesa más de 30 libras (más de 13.6 kilos). Fue muy difícil; hice este trabajo durante un año y medio. En San Quintín coseché tomates también, pero no era tan duro.

Recientemente hemos visto que crece el movimiento de jornaleros en San Quintin -la Alianza de Organizaciones Nacionales, Estatales y Municipales por la Justicia Social-. Están defendiendo a la gente. Para mí es muy importante que haya alguien dispuesto a defender a la gente. Los partidos políticos no están interesados en lo que nos está pasando en el trabajo. No sé cómo inició la Alianza, pero he oído que está enfrentando una gran cantidad de amenazas por parte de las empresas y del gobierno. Los ricos y los patrones han comprado al gobierno. Ellos pagan a la policía, que luego dispara contra la gente. No importa si son mujeres o niños. Eso es lo peor que he visto en el Valle de San Quintín.

En algún momento yo regresaré a México. Las amenazas que recibieron podrían afectarme a mi también. Estoy muy agradecido por el movimiento que organizaron. Quiero enviar un saludo a todos los líderes en San Quintín. En 2013 Sakuma Brothers, aquí en el estado de Washington, nos amenazó también, debido al movimiento que organizamos. Nos amenazaron con la policía y contrataron consultores y guardias. Su propósito era dividirnos. Gracias al sindicato que organizamos aquí, Familias Unidas por la Justicia, nos hemos mantenido firmes, y la empresa no logró deshacerse de nosotros. Seguimos luchando.

Por eso estoy tan interesado en la lucha que hay en el Valle de San Quintín. Cuando oí que habían estallado en huelga, hablé con mi hermano y le pedí el número de teléfono de la estación de radio allá. Luego hablé a la estación y me dieron el número de Bonifacio Martínez, de la Alianza. Así nos pudimos comunicar con los líderes.

Al parecer, habían llegado a un acuerdo sobre los salarios. Pero después recibieron una respuesta del gobierno el año pasado, y entiendo que el gobernador se retractó y no cumplió su palabra, y lo mismo hicieron los patrones. Así que luego comenzó el boicot contra Driscoll, la compañía que distribuye una gran cantidad de berries de San Quintín. Ha sido difícil mantener la comunicación, pero no hemos perdido el contacto.

Ellos saben algo de nuestra lucha aquí en el estado de Washington. Nuestro movimiento se inició el 11 de julio de 2013, el primer día de nuestra huelga en Sakuma Farms. A veces la lucha ha sido muy dura. A veces nos sentimos cansados. Pero luego recuperamos la fuerza y continuamos. Y tenemos la ayuda de una gran cantidad de sindicatos, periodistas y partidarios del boicot. Y estamos logrando cosas.

En 2013, en cierto momento estábamos negociando con la empresa para mejorar las condiciones de todos los trabajadores de Sakuma Brothers. Sakuma firmó un acuerdo y dijo que lo respetaría, pero después de dos semanas faltó a su palabra. Fue entonces cuando comenzamos nuestro boicoteo, y éste crece día con día. Sakuma envía su fruta a Driscoll en Watsonville. En 2013 le dije a los compañeros que debíamos ir a Watsonville para llevar nuestro boicot allá. Pensaba yo que si Driscoll veía allí a la gente no presionaría más a la empresa.

El boicot siguió creciendo y Driscoll sintió la presión. Por último, la empresa buscó a uno de nuestros seguidores y le dijo que querían hablar con nosotros y buscar la forma de frenar el boicot. Así que el año pasado, el 8 de mayo, fuimos a la oficina de Driscoll en Watsonville. Pensé que su almacén era pequeño, pero en realidad tiene dos construcciones muy grandes.  Tienen de todo en Driscoll.

Empezamos a hablar de por qué comenzó el boicot. Al principio pusieron un gran plato sobre la mesa con fresas, arándanos, frambuesas y moras. Nos ofrecieron que las probáramos. Dijimos: "¿cómo vamos a probar esto si los estamos boicoteando?"

Estuvimos allí casi un día. Ellos dijeron que no podían obligar a Sakuma a firmar un contrato. Dijimos, ok, el boicot continuará hasta que tengamos un contrato sindical. Este año Sakuma ha dicho que quiere negociar con nosotros, pero vamos a ver qué pasa. Sakuma ahora contrató a un gringo que, se supone, es bueno para trabajar en lugares donde hay demandas colectivas y problemas.

El año pasado estaban pagando diez dólares por hora, y dicen que es mucho. Sin embargo, a pesar de que pagan por hora, exigen la cosecha de 50 libras por hora para el pago de los diez dólares. Por cinco libras más, se da un bono de 1.50, o sea 11.50 por hora. Pero sólo los trabajadores que trabajan rápido pueden conseguir eso. Desde 2013, el pago semanal ha venido disminuyendo, tanto en las fresas como en los arándanos. El año pasado y éste las personas han estallado en huelga porque no están de acuerdo con los salarios.

Cuando los trabajadores estallaron la huelga el año pasado, aunque yo estaba trabajando en otra empresa fui con ellos. No quería dejar a los otros mixtecos solos; son mi pueblo y me eligieron como vicepresidente del sindicato. Tuve que viajar desde muy lejos para llegar con ellos, pero había cerca de 250 personas esperándome. Me dijeron que había que hacer algo, así que fuimos a un campo donde la gente todavía estaba trabajando. Nos dijeron que el pago no era bueno, y dejaron de trabajar también.

Cuando demandamos un contrato colectivo, los supervisores dijeron que no discutirían eso. Después enviaron a la policía. La policía pidió hablar conmigo, y dijo que yo no trabajaba allí. Alfredo Juárez, de nuestro comité, dijo que yo tenía derecho a estar allí porque soy el vicepresidente del sindicato. Los policías dijeron que iban a arrestarme. Así que la gente preguntó: "¿Van a detenernos a todos nosotros?". La policía no supo qué decir.

Finalmente la policía dijo que si no nos salíamos del campo e íbamos hacia un lugar público, tendrían que sacarnos. Así que la gente dijo que estaba bien, y todos abandonamos el campo y nos fuimos al supermercado Costco, en Burlington, para manifestar el boicoteo. Al día siguiente, la compañía compró burritos para todo el mundo en el trabajo.

Este año ha habido más huelgas como ésta, y más manifestaciones de boicot. Es por eso que la compañía dice ahora que quiere negociar con nosotros.

Al hablar con Bonifacio, le pedí que la Alianza hiciera un boicot  también. Nosotros en el Norte y ellos en el Sur. De esta manera pondríamos más presión sobre Driscoll. Hablamos de las tácticas que usamos y le relaté nuestra historia. Él dijo que Driscoll y la Alianza habían ido con gobierno para pedir que los salarios se elevaran. Creo que eso no es bueno. El gobierno tiene su papel, pero Driscoll tiene que hablar con sus trabajadores, como Berrymex, y asegurar que van a pagarles bien. Eso es lo que nosotros le decimos a Driscoll. No vamos a detener el boicot hasta el día en que firmemos un contrato en Sakuma. Lo mismo con Driscoll y Berrymex.

Creo que la idea de un sindicato independiente en San Quintín es lo mejor que pudieron hacer, con un contrato directo. Los trabajadores agrícolas de San Quintín han estado sufriendo durante más de 20 años. Los salarios de hambre son la razón por la cual las personas se declararon en huelga. Están haciendo una cosa muy buena. Pero pienso que es mejor firmar un contrato colectivo con las empresas. El gobierno no es el propietario de las fincas. Es mejor forzar a los patrones a pagar. Ellos son millonarios. Las empresas tienen la responsabilidad principal de pagar bien a los trabajadores. Estamos exigiendo las mismas cosas aquí y alla, y la empresa es la misma, Driscoll.

El año pasado me invitaron a hablar por teléfono en la radio en San Quintín, para que todos allá pudieran oír sobre nosotros. Quería decirle a la gente que se involucrara en el movimiento. Es bueno para todos. La huelga es la mejor manera de conseguir un salario justo. Quería decirle a la gente que no se desanime, que en el estado de Washington estamos luchando también. Pero entonces las personas de la estación de radio dijeron que no estaban autorizados, y finalmente no me dejaron hablar.

Gente de Santa María y Madera, en California, nos está apoyando. Muchos de ellos vienen a Washington en la temporada de berries, y están trabajando en Sakuma hoy día. Son miembros de Familias Unidas. No sé si la gente también esté pensando en hacer huelga en California. En Greenfield, en el Valle de Salinas en California, hay una gran cantidad de personas de la región triqui, y organizan muchos movimientos. Son muy combativos. Tal vez van a organizar un movimiento allí. Sería maravilloso.

Todos somos parte de un movimiento indígena. En San Quintín la mayoría de las personas son indígenas. En la radio no hablan mixteco, zapoteco, triqui ni náhuatl. Su movimiento de huelga es indígena. Todos los involucrados en nuestro sindicato en Washington también son indígenas.

Aquí los indígenas están muy preocupados por el riesgo de ser despedidos. Los supervisores y capataces les gritan y empujan con fuerza. Ellos abusan de los trabajadores indígenas más que de cualquier otro. Es lo mismo aquí y en Baja California. Lo que queremos es el respeto de todos. No importa si eres de Guatemala u Honduras, Chiapas o Guerrero. Los derechos humanos son para todo el mundo. Pero a veces la gente nos ve como si fuéramos inferiores. Creen que no tenemos derechos. Pero se equivocan. El derecho de ser humano es el mismo. Debería haber respeto para todos.

Cuando nos fuimos a la huelga en 2013, muchos de nosotros no hablaban bien el español. Algunos de los jóvenes en el trabajo pudieron haber dicho: "Estas personas no saben cómo hablar. No saben lo que están haciendo". Seguramente los supervisores decían eso también. Un año más tarde, ganamos una demanda legal para obligar a Sakuma a pagarnos el tiempo de descanso. Ganamos más de 800 mil dólares. Después de eso, la gente que nos rechazaba comenzó a buscarnos. Los jóvenes que se burlaban de nosotros se nos acercaron, pues querían dinero.

Hay más rabia ahora. La gente cree que no deberían estar viviendo en malas condiciones, las personas no deben ser maltratadas. Más personas están defendiendo sus derechos. Una gran cantidad de gente nueva que viene de California ya está con nosotros. Tienen una buena manera de pensar. Si no luchamos por nosotros mismos, ¿quién lo va a hacer? Si los patrones quieren pisotearnos, si el gobierno y la policía no nos quieren, no hay otro camino más que luchar.