Saturday, July 27, 2024

US CORPORATIONS PUMP AQUIFERS DRY IN MEXICO - POLICE KILL WATER DEFENDERS

US CORPORATIONS PUMP AQUIFERS DRY IN MEXICO - POLICE KILL WATER DEFENDERS
By David Bacon
Truthout - 7/26/24
https://truthout.org/articles/us-corporations-pump-aquifers-dry-as-police-kill-water-defenders-in-rural-mexico/

Farmers are risking their lives to fight back against the US-owned factory farms that are destroying Mexico's water.


Fausto Limon looks at his bean plants, knowing they need more fertilizer, but lacking the money to buy it, in Veracruz, Mexico.


On June 20, more than 200 angry farmers pulled their tractors into the highway outside the Carroll Farms feed plant in the Mexican town of Totalco, Veracruz, blocking traffic. Highway blockades are a traditional form of protest in Mexico. Every year, poor communities mount dozens, seeing them as their only way to get powerful elites to hear their demands.

At first, the Totalco blockade was no different. Farmers yelled at the guards behind the feed plant gates, as they protested extreme water use by Carroll Farms and its contamination of the water table. Then the police arrived in pickup trucks. They began grabbing people they thought were the leaders. One was Don Guadalupe Serrano, an old man who'd led earlier protests going back more than a decade. After he was put in handcuffs and shoved into a police car, farmers surrounded it and rescued him.

"Then four police grabbed me," recalls Renato Romero, a farmer from nearby Ocotepec and a protest leader. "I was rescued too. But then more police arrived and began beating people. We put our bodies in front of their guns and said, 'Shoot us!' And they began shooting."

Two young brothers, Jorge and Alberto Cortina Vázquez, were killed, their bodies found beside their family's tractor used in the demonstration. Each had been shot several times, one of their widows said. Others were wounded by gunfire. The farmers had no weapons. As they fled back into town, the police chased them, Romero says. "They followed people in the streets, and went into homes, shooting. Afterwards you could see the high caliber shells on the floors of the houses. They didn't try to talk. They just wanted to terrorize us."

This bitter confrontation and the death of two campesinos is more than simply a bloody tragedy south of the border. It is one more example of the impact U.S. food corporations have had on local farm communities as they've expanded in Mexico. That process is felt north of the border as well, in the spread of disease, the displacement of local communities and resulting migration, and even in the national politics of both countries.

Granjas Carroll (the name of Carroll Farms in Mexico) is a division of the huge U.S.-based Smithfield Foods meatpacking company. It owns a vast network of industrial pig farms in this one valley on the border of Puebla and Veracruz states. Here, large barns each house hundreds of animals at a time. The urine and feces they produce is concentrated in big open-air oxidation pools or lagoons.

According to a Humane Society International report, pigs produce four times more waste than human beings: "One animal facility with a large population of animals can easily equal a small city in terms of waste production. This is particularly worrisome for certain regions in Mexico like the Perote Valley, which ... has a pig population five times greater than that of its human population."

The killings created a political storm in Veracruz. Within a few days, more than 50 organizations throughout Latin America had signed a statement condemning "brutal repression" and demanding to know who was responsible. Despite the police attack, after four days farmers returned and reinstituted their planton, or blockade. The municipal president of Totalco, Delfino Ortega, blocked the road with them.

The state administration of Gov. Cuitláhuac García Jiménez then announced that the special police unit that shot the farmers, the Fuerza Civil, would be dissolved. The unit was created in 2014 by the previous governor, Javier Duarte de Ochoa (now in prison for corruption), and had a reputation for kidnappings, extortion and disappearances.

Six days after the killings, Governor García announced the company plant in Totalco would be partially closed because of violations of regulations governing water consumption and pollution from the lagoons. The Veracruz State's Attorney Office for Environmental Protection said it would carry out inspections at the 51 Granjas Carroll facilities located in the municipality of Perote, where Totalco is located. The head of the agency, Sergio Rodríguez Cortés, said that so far nine facilities have been reviewed and various irregularities have been found.

 


The mill for hog feed owned by Granjas Carroll de Mexico near Perote.

Granjas Carroll Pumps Water, Farmers Go Dry

Perote and Totalco are towns in the Libres-Oriental basin, a large enclosed valley surrounded by mountains and volcanos. It's dotted with shallow lakes in former volcanic craters, historically sustained by underground water. In this basin, water runs not to the ocean, but into its interior, and rain that falls here sinks into the aquifer below. There is very little surface water, and the recharge of the aquifer mostly comes from surrounding mountains as it passes underground into the basin. Libres-Oriental is essentially an enormous natural water storage facility.

Farmers say that 20 years ago, the water level was just a meter below the surface in their fields near the lakes, with natural springs throughout the region. Today, the land is dry.

Mexico has enormous and growing water problems. Some 104 basins like Libres-Oriental have a deficit - the amount of water recharging their aquifers is less that the amount being extracted. The University Center for Regional Disaster Prevention (Cupreder) at the Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla charges that in 2016, the aquifer already had a deficit of 0.35 million cubic meters annually. This was the year the Audi auto assembly plant located in the basin started up its assembly lines. By 2023, the aquifer deficit approached 22 million cubic meters.

Cupreder Director Aurelio Fernández Fuentes says Conagua, the National Water Commission that manages Mexico's water and gives permits for its extraction, does not have an aquifer recharge policy. "It only extracts," he said. "There is no transparency in issuing concessions, because there is a shady business that the Fourth Transformation [the administration of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO)] has not resolved."

According to José Vicente Nolasco Valencia, another researcher at Cupreder, the alarming growth of the deficit is due to corporate extraction from the industrial park where the Audi and Mercedes-Benz plants are located, Coca-Cola's water bottling facility, the recently built complex of 14 military factories, and Granjas Carroll's pig farms.

Agribusiness operations, which started two decades ago, also contribute. Former Mexican President Vicente Fox began growing broccoli on his large landholdings in the basin after leaving office in 2006, and today factory farms grow and sell berries for the Driscoll's berry conglomerate. They all have Conagua's permits for industrial agriculture.

Granjas Carroll was given five concessions between 2020 and 2024, in addition to its original permits, to pump more water from the aquifer below the Libres-Oriental basin. The company's water consumption doubled in that period. It now has permits to pump 3.8 million cubic meters of water per year. Of that, Granjas Carroll says it uses 3.54 million cubic meters to produce 1.67 million pigs per year on 121 farms, as well as in a processing plant and two feed distribution facilities.

The basin has theoretically been closed to new water extraction for 20 years, because the rate at which water is pumped is greater than the recharge of the aquifer. As a result, throughout that time, small farmers have been denied pumping permits, Romero told me. But under neoliberal changes in water law made since 1982 by the administrations prior to the current government of López Obrador, water use was modified. New permits were made available for industrial users and private water concessions. Granjas Carroll got its permits as an industrial user under this neoliberal system.

"We have been six years with no harvests," Renato Romero charges, "and for three years we haven't even had water for planting. I'm 63, and my land belonged to my mother. I've lived my whole life here. But we have no way to farm anymore." The government action in closing the Totalco plant is meaningless, he says. "This is just where they make food for the pigs. They have others like it, and more than 100 farms where the contamination comes from. No one is closing them. Our fields are dry, while big ranches have green fields of broccoli all year around."

Romero is a member of the Movement in Defense of Water in the Libres-Oriental basin. Farmers in the movement have three demands: They should have access to water, so they can stay on the land; the foreign companies in the Libres-Oriental basin should be forced to leave; and the people responsible for the murders of the two farmers should be held responsible. "Who gave the order?" Romero asks.

The Granjas Carroll hog farm next to the ranch of Fausto Limon.

Doing What It Couldn't Do at Home

"Granjas Carroll can do here what it can't do at home," Carolina Ramirez, who formerly headed the women's department of the Veracruz Human Rights Commission, told me. In Virginia in 1997, Federal Judge Rebecca Smith imposed the largest Clean Water Act fine to that date - $12.6 million - on Smithfield Foods, which owns Granjas Carroll, for dumping pig excrement into the Pagan River, running into Chesapeake Bay. The state of North Carolina, no friend to environmentalists, went further, passing a temporary moratorium on the creation of any new open-air hog waste lagoons, made permanent in 2007.

In the Libres-Oriental basin, however, Granjas Carroll didn't have to worry about U.S. regulations. No complaint was ever filed under the North American Free Trade Agreement's (NAFTA) side agreement supposedly enforcing Mexican environmental standards. Each of the company's 121 hog farms has a lagoon for waste.

When the company built one of its sheds half a mile from the farm of Fausto Limon, it changed his life. On some warm nights, his children would wake up and vomit from the smell. He'd put his wife, two sons and daughter into his beat-up pickup, and they'd drive away from his farm until they could breathe the air without getting sick. Then he'd park, and they'd sleep in the truck for the rest of the night. Limon and his family all had painful kidney ailments until they began hauling in bottled water. Once they stopped drinking from their farm's well, the infections stopped too.

According to Veronica Hernandez, a schoolteacher in La Gloria, another town in the basin, students told her coming to school on the bus was like riding in a toilet. "Some of them fainted or got headaches," she charged. In 2007, Granjas Carroll filed criminal complaints against Hernandez and 13 other leaders for circulating a petition protesting the conditions, charging them with "defaming" the company. Until the charges were dropped after a year, she had to travel to the state capital, Puebla, every month to report to the prosecutor's office.

Then, in early 2009, the first confirmed case of swine flu, the A/H1N1 virus, was found in an 8-year-old boy from La Gloria, Edgar Hernandez. According to Hernandez and others from the town, pickup trucks from the local health department began spraying pesticide in the streets to kill the omnipresent flies that could potentially transmit the virus from pigs to humans. Nevertheless, the virus spread to Mexico City. By May, 45 people in Mexico had died. From there, it spread around the world.

Granjas Carroll's Public Relations Director Tito Tablada Cortés denied the virus came from its Veracruz hogs, and Mexican officials were quick to agree. He wrote to the newspaper Imagen de Veracruz, asserting, "Our company has been totally cleared of any links with the AH1N1 virus," and "the official position of the Secretary of Health and the World Health Organization leaves no room for doubt." In the valley, though, "no one believed it," Limon recalled.

Because there is no water outlet to the ocean, what goes into the Libres-Oriental groundwater stays there. Anabel, an environmental activist with Manos Unidas por una Cuenca Libre (United Hands for a Free Basin), who didn't want to use her last name for fear of retaliation, told me: "Wells around the pig farms are contaminated with aguas negras [black, or polluted, water]. They bring up mud with a bad smell. Many of those older wells that farmers have had for years are going dry. Because they're shallow, to get more and cleaner water they need to dig deeper and can't get permission. In any case, deeper wells cost a lot of money, which they don't have. The only farms that can get permission and have the money are the big industrial farms."

Small towns also feel the impact. Many of them don't have public wells or can't get permission to dig new ones. Water service has been privatized, and private operators get permits from Conagua for commercial use, she charges.

Granjas Carroll also had a big impact on Mexican pig farmers. Smithfield not only produces hogs in Mexico, but is also one of the biggest exporters of pork to Mexico from its U.S. operations. According to Alejandro Ramírez, general director of the Confederation of Mexican Pork Producers, Mexico imported 811,000 tons by 2010, after NAFTA took down tariff barriers. Pork prices received by Mexican producers dropped 56 percent. "We lost 4,000 pig farms," Ramírez estimated, "20,000 farm jobs directly from imports. Counting the five indirect jobs dependent on each direct job, we lost over 120,000 jobs in total.... That produces migration to the U.S. or to Mexican cities."

A farmer who can longer farm waits to find work in Xalapa, Veracruz.

Growing Resistance

The first environmental movements to protect the basin were organized in the 1980s and 1990s, against a project to pump out water to supply the city of Puebla, and eventually Mexico City itself. That was stopped, but as NAFTA took hold, the government of President Carlos Salinas de Gortari modified Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution to allow the privatization of land formerly held in ejidos, the collective units established under the land reforms following the revolution of 1910-20 and the land struggles that followed.

That change allowed Granjas Carroll to buy the land for its swine sheds. Farmers have been trying to stop the operation of Granjas Carroll ever since the enterprise arrived in the Perote Valley in 1993 and dramatically changed rural life.

Various groups, like Pueblos Unidos del Valle de Perote (United People of the Perote Valley), have fought the company, along with residents of many of the valley's towns. In 2005, protesters blocked the main highway, as they did in June. A construction crew about to build a shed and oxidation pond was met by a thousand angry farmers. Police had to rescue the workers, but their heavy equipment disappeared once they left. In 2007, Granjas Carroll's Tito Tablada signed an agreement with local towns blocking any new expansion. In 2011, however, company representatives convinced the municipal president of Guadalupe Victoria, the municipality next to Perote, to grant a permit for construction of new hog farms.

Following the most recent protests, communities and environmental organizations held a National Meeting in Solidarity with Totalco and the Movement in Defense of Water in Libres-Oriental. Their demands included "the departure of transnational companies that plunder its resources." They declared a state of rebellion against Conagua, accusing it of being "submerged in corruption" for granting concessions only to corporations and not to farmers, noting that the basin has been closed to locals for 20 years.

The meeting announced the formation of the Veracruz Assembly of Environmental Initiatives and Defense of Life. "We join the cry for justice that resonates throughout Mexico against Granjas Carroll," its statement said, "a company that for more than 15 years has contaminated the air, soil and water of the region with the complicity of the government."

 


A local farmer declares that the people of the Perote Valley want the hog farms to leave.

Pushing Foreign Companies Out?

Local and national environmental groups have different perspectives on how to resolve the water crisis in the Perote Valley. The Veracruz government asserts that its partial and temporary closing of the Granjas Carroll feed plant in Totalco, and the promise of more rigorous inspections of the company's other facilities, will protect the rights of residents and the environment. At the same time, the company will continue to operate.

Sergio Rodríguez Cortés, director of the Veracruz State Environmental Protection Agency, says it has found violations in nine other facilities, and more inspections are planned. Most involve the pig feces and urine collected in the lagoons attached to the sheds, which he admitted were finding their way into the water table.

The agency has given the company until September to remedy the violations, and Granjas Carroll has signed an agreement to spend money on remediation. Further sanctions, however, are up to Conagua and the federal prosecutor for environmental protection. Neither has said publicly what enforcement measures they plan to take, if any. Puebla Gov. Salomón Céspedes Peregrina said he has set up a dialogue process between farmers and the company.

"We don't want any more dialogue," Renato Romero responded. "We've seen for 20 years that it changes nothing." Another group, the Colectivo Ambiental Diente de Leon (the Dandelion Environmental Collective), issued three demands in response to the recent protests: "Granjas Carroll get out! Make a new general water law in Mexico. Get rid of Conagua, and establish a fair administration of water."

Anabel of Manos Unidas por una Cuenca Libre warns that far from diminishing the role of foreign investment, the Puebla state government is encouraging more. "Our first demand should be stopping the investment wave," she says. The valley may have lithium deposits, much sought-after for electric vehicles, and the Mexican army has been given the concession nationally for exploration and development. The Libres-Oriental basin already has Canadian mine concessions and several military installations.

"Getting rid of foreign companies will be a very long struggle," Anabel warned. "Maybe they'd go if the water dries up, but in meantime, they'll be extracting even more of it. So, we want the government at least to stop giving more concessions, especially for mining, and then to go on to cancel the ones already given." At the same time, she says, "We want a better level of regulation of the use of water. Residents get water once or twice a month, and the companies get it every day. There should at least be equal access."

In the neoliberal economic model Mexican governments pursued for decades, strict regulation was considered a barrier to foreign investment. Lack of enforcement of existing laws, no matter how good they were, was used as an incentive for companies to invest, from the maquiladora factories on the U.S. border to Granjas Carroll in the Perote Valley.

The accumulated popular anger of almost four decades was a big reason President Andrés Manuel López Obrador won office in 2018, and he promised a change in direction. Speaking to the Mexican Congress as he was sworn in, he declared: "For three decades the highest authorities have dedicated themselves ... to concessioning the territory and transferring companies and public goods, and even functions of the State to national and foreign individuals."

In the Perote Valley, AMLO's description rang true. Granjas Carroll and Smithfield "turned the local economy into a living laboratory for all that is wrong with NAFTA," Tim Wise, senior advisor at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy at Tufts University, told me. "Open-door policies for multinational firms are enshrined in NAFTA and its successor agreement, the USMCA [U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement]. Thanks to the agreements, these firms don't have to guarantee environmental compliance, labor rights or good working conditions as a condition for their investments. And the profits do not have to be reinvested in Mexico."

Promising change, AMLO told Congress: "We will put aside the neoliberal hypocrisy. The State will take care of reducing social inequalities, social justice will not continue to be displaced from the government's agenda. Those born poor will not be condemned to die poor."

"AMLO's economic policies then fostered the development of safety nets for poor people especially, with cash transfer programs, including pensions and education subsidies," explained Gaspar Rivera-Salgado, director of the Center for Mexican Studies at UCLA, and co-founder of the Frente Indigena de Organizaciones Binacionales, an organization of Indigenous Mexicans, with chapters on both sides of the border. In reality, however, AMLO's administration inherited an economy that was already heavily dependent on foreign investment.

"The money for those programs depended on healthy economic growth, and that in turn depended on investment and increased ties to the U.S., Mexico's number one trading partner. So, the neoliberal model wasn't dramatically altered, and we now see the contradictions," Rivera-Salgado told me. "There's a growing fight for natural resources, especially water, which has become very scarce. The primary consumer with guaranteed access is industry, like Granjas Carroll. In effect, it is a subsidy. This is a structural issue. You can tinker around the edges, but the model depends on the subsidies."

Social conflicts over water access, mining concessions and environmental degradation are the product of these continuing contradictions. And with the political changes of the Fourth Transformation, the name given to AMLO's policy agenda, the Mexican state is now administered by people who fought neoliberal policies in their youth. Both Puebla and Veracruz are governed by Morena, AMLO's party. As a student, Veracruz Gov. Cuitláhuac García Jiménez belonged to the Mexican Socialist Party and was a follower of Heberto Castillo, a historic figure of the Mexican left.

The conflicts include those within Morena itself. One Morena deputy in Puebla, Fernando Sánchez Sasia, proposed punishing farmers who organized more plantons with up to four years in jail. Puebla Gov. Salomón Céspedes Peregrina killed the proposal, saying that criminalizing protest "will never be the answer" to social conflict. President López Obrador declared in one of his daily morning press conferences that there would be no impunity for the two police arrested for shooting Jorge and Alberto Cortina Vázquez.

A New President, But a New Direction?

Mexico has just chosen a new president, Claudia Sheinbaum, who comes from a left-wing family of scientists and was herself a left activist in her youth. With a doctorate in energy engineering, she was secretary for the environment in Mexico City when AMLO was mayor, and eventually was elected mayor herself. As mayor, she agreed that water is a human right, and promised to provide water service to everyone in the city. As a scientist, she seems to grasp the looming environmental crises facing the nation, especially when it comes to water.

However, according to Paloma Duran, an analyst for Mexico Business News, although the corporate elite were worried, "the appointment of the new cabinet members, especially Marcelo Ebrard as the new Minister of Economy, has brought certainty and confidence to both investors and international markets." Ebrard's appointment especially "signals openness to business, alleviating market concerns."

Sheinbaum herself reiterated López Obrador's rejection of neoliberalism and privatization in a joint post-election tour of Puebla and other states in early July. "Now President López Obrador has returned the rights that belong to the people of Mexico and we will never allow them to be taken away again," she said. In San Luis Potosi she declared that AMLO had replaced the neoliberal model with a moral economy and Mexican humanism, "a government by and for the people of Mexico."

"Will Sheinbaum be able to maintain the core investment model and at the same time address the issues the farmers are raising?" Rivera-Salgado asks. "We don't know yet. A lot depends on how strong the social movements become, and their demands for change."

Anabel is confident, though. "We water defenders say: the water is worth more than gold, it is life," she declares. "We have denounced the death industries. Two people have died, and others are sick. But we don't have to wait until blood flows, if these farmers and the original inhabitants of this valley are heard."

Tuesday, July 9, 2024

TWO VETERAN MAQUILADORA WOMEN ORGANIZERS

TWO VETERAN MAQUILADORA WOMEN ORGANIZERS
By David Bacon
UCLA Center for Mexican Studies, UCLA Labor Center, 6/9/24
https://irle.ucla.edu/2024/03/20/two-veteran-women-organizers/

Members of the original independent union committee at the Mex Mode maquiladora.

Interviews with organizers Julia Quiñones and Julieta Morales offer their vision for a new era of labor solidarity.  These interviews forms part of a series of interviews with prominent Mexican labor leaders conducted by photojournalist, author, political activist and union organizer David Bacon. These interviews are a collaboration between IRLE, the Labor Center and the Center for Mexican Studies at UCLA.

Organizing among maquiladora workers, especially in the factories on the border, has gone in waves over the past four decades. In many cases, those efforts have led to the creation of cross-border relationships between unions and activists on both sides of the Mexico/U.S. border, and even to organizational structures that produced programs and actions beyond supporting individual campaigns. Because of the demographics of the maquiladora workforce, some of the most important organizers have been women.  

Today another wave of organizing activity is growing, and with it debates about how new independent unions should be organized, and the relationship they should have to established unions in both countries. Julia Quiñones and Julieta Morales are veterans of these efforts, and in these interviews offer their visions for a new era of labor activity and solidarity.

Julia Quiñones is the director of the Comite Fronteriza de Obreras (the Border Committee of Workers), one of the most important organizations in the long history of the efforts to organize workers in the maquiladoras on the Mexico/U.S. border. CFO began officially in '98, but Quiñones was doing basic work long before. She offers the perspective of a veteran of the border labor wars. When I interviewed her at a conference organized by the Solidarity Center and the UCLA Labor Center, she began by saying that this cross-border effort was happening "in a new era."

Julia Quiñones with a strike leader from the Audi assembly plant.

JULIA QUINONES

We need more than yesterday's ideas. A lot of things have changed in Mexico. There is a lot of movement now at the national level and changes are taking place. In Mexico we had the 2019 labor reform, and in the United States recently there was the big autoworkers strike. We've learned a great deal from both. Now many unions and organizations in Mexico are looking for ways we can influence this movement more effectively.   

This is also a cultural moment, where workers have to learn to work together because they work for the same companies. In the past the possibility of having independent unions on the border, in the maquilas, practically didn't exist. That was the situation for decades. Now I think that we are seeing the possibility of seeing real unions, if the charros don't take it away from us. I would like to be optimistic and say we still have the initiative, because the conditions are still there. But we have to deal with the history of so many years of oppression by corporate unions.

The change is not going to be easy, and the charros are defending themselves. On the other hand, we have the initiatives of many independent workers who are seeking to build new organizations, but they often lack a lot of confidence. Until recently there was a lot of apathy, and workers would say, no se puede, that things could not be changed. We have to develop new strategies and I believe that it can be done.

This is what we have been working on for 4 years. In 2019 CFO began a project to make workers aware of the labor reform. This is something that the Ministry of Labor was also doing, but at the CFO we believe that it is important to bring this information from person to person, through small group meetings, so that workers truly understand the opportunities they have now. The more they know, the more they spread the information through their social connections with co-workers.  

In the last three years we have supported four organizing campaigns. In one they were able to create an independent union, and in another it barely exists yet.  Workers were able to create an independent union (using the sponsorship of the Liga Sindical Obrera Mexicana) in a company called Delta Staff. This is a garment company that produces for brands like The Gap and Levi's. They make pants, belts and uniforms. Eighty-seven percent of the workers voted for an independent union against the CTM.

Things happen by systematically accompanying the workers, by training leaders, and by promoting gender empowerment. But nothing is going to happen just because the opportunity exists. You have to do a lot of organizational work. There has been a lot of talk about the TMEC and the labor reform, but they only create opportunity. You need to organize people.  

But the workers have to make the decisions, even if there is a lot of money and many organizers. We need to help workers make a comprehensive plan, that is, by giving them training in creating a strategy, and by looking for leaders. These are steps that have to be followed before we can make changes.

Union support for campaigns is also important, especially by unions on the other side of the border, like the UAW. In the past it was much easier to organize if we could use an existing registry of another union. CFO had a relationship with the miners and they had a relationship with the United Steel Workers (USW). In the Delta Staff campaign, CFO had the support of Workers United, which represents Levi's workers in the U.S.

Francisco Ortiz worked at Ken-Mex, a medical products plant built in Tijuana in the 1980s by Kendall International. He shared a small house, in a neighborhood below Otay Mesa, with three sons, who lived with him in the front room, with his uncle, his wife and children, and with his mother and grandmother.

Today workers have more options. Now there are ways workers can create their own independent union. This is something that will have to be explored. Solidarity and the work of exchanges within the independent labor movement are very important. It is very important that workers do not feel isolated, that those who want to organize have a network, a support system. That is also why international union solidarity is very important.

Companies that are in Mexico have headquarters in the United States or in other countries, so we need to make connections there with unions, with shareholders, with brands. That helps to neutralize the company when they try to intervene to stop workers from organizing.

Organizations on the border have always lacked resources. Today we really want to have an impact. In the past our organization has been very small, just 8 or 10 people. Now we have to grow. We have 30 people today, but of course having them creates new challenges. How do we guarantee the work of these teams will continue?

No fight is automatic, that is, it takes 2 or 3 years to have an impact. We have to create a stable basis for this work, because things may change in the future. Ten years down the line, who knows what the situation will be? That is why it is very important to create self-sufficient, self-managing organizations, and not depend always on international solidarity to develop organizing campaigns. If there is more self-sustainability, then organizational projects can continue.

Labor reform will have an impact on the labor movement in Mexico in general, not only in the export factories. The impact is going to be general. It is going to take longer than we had expected and we truly hope that with the coming change in government this reform will be sustained and not thrown out. If the same policy continues, at least of the current President, we hope there will be no setback in what's already been achieved.

Now there is a new attitude on the part of the automobile union in the United States. We have already had several meetings with UAW unions, and they really have a vision now. There's more openness and more collaboration with our movement. At this particular meeting it is important to have a plan at least to keep in touch. We need better communication so we can share struggles.  

This meeting is a bit strange, because it's a mix of people from big factories and Uber drivers and domestic workers. We need to close the gaps between us. Both domestic workers and workers in the informal sector seek strategies to guarantee their rights. We can learn a lot from them, and also from the large already established unions, such as the automobile unions or the electrical workers or others.

There is a new role for working women here at this meeting. It's very, very interesting. When we divided ourselves into sectors, the groups were dominated by men in the automotive sector, while in the others there were many more women. In the group of domestic workers there was only one man and a male baby. This does not reflect the gender composition that predominates in the industry. It's something we have to work on. In fact, reforms in Mexico now require companies to have gender protocols. But is gender equality required in the union leadership under the labor reform? We have to look at that, and at other areas too.

Julieta Morales marches to the Mexican consulate in Los Angeles in support of the Audi strikers.

Julieta Morales today is the General Secretary of the Union League of Mexican Workers (Liga Sindical Obrera Mexicana), and worked at a garment factory, Mex Mode, that was the scene of one of the first successful battles to form an independent union in the maquiladoras. The League was formed in Atlixco, Puebla, after workers organized the union at Mex Mode, and today has gone on to help workers organize independent unions in a number of other factories.

JULIETA MORALES

I worked in that maquiladora (Mex Mode), and it took courage to stand up against all the violations of our rights in the plant. There was a lot of discrimination, workplace harassment and our wages at that time were 70 pesos. That was what started our organizing.

At that time, an external organization helped us understand that we had the right to organize, and what unions were. The Solidarity Center supported the Mexican NGO, Centro de Apoyo al Trabajador (Center for Support for Workers - CAT) composed of five local organizers. We won an independent union, but we had many problems after we organized this union. A real workers' union will always be in trouble with the company.  

During the initial campaign in Mex Mode, workers were beaten at the gate when we were trying to organize. Then we asked for support from students in the United States and on various campuses they told the university they did not want the student stores to sell shoes and other Nike clothing. With this pressure, Nike was forced to put pressure on Mex Mode to remove the charro union and recognize the workers' independent union and negotiate a contract.

We are seeing the same possibility or possibilities like this, to help workers in other factories. With the decision made by the people in the factory, the possibility exists of using the same pressure of international solidarity. The brands we are working on right now include Carhartt, North Face, Fanatics, the Kiss, Vans, and Timberland. They are brands exported from Mexico to the United States. Therefore we believe that a good alliance can be built between workers in Mexico and the United States.  

The raw materials and orders are from the United States, and without them we have no more work. We want the companies to continue to exist here, and we want the brands themselves to understand that our workforce is very strong in Mexico. Let the brands give us more work. We want to prevent our own families from emigrating to the United States because when people leave it becomes complicated for many mothers who are left with the responsibility of their children. But we want to have better conditions. We want brands to establish codes of conduct that are truly respected. Since we work with brands that are expensive, from clothes to cars, we deserve to have better salaries, we deserve to be respected within the plant.

We don't want the brands to withdraw because we depend on them. That is our source of work. It's not just the 500 workers, since behind those 500 workers are their families. The charro union threatens people by telling them that the League has alliances with the United States. We're bad because the United States loves us, and wants to take their jobs away. But we know that we only ask that the worker be treated as a human being, as a person. And a foreign company should respect this, because they are coming to our house. And if you are welcome to our house, we are going to set the rules for you.  

Later, after we organized our independent union, there was a conflict, and Antorcha Campesina set up a company union. It keeps its power by making threats against workers. My coworkers there are from rural communities, so they don't know where to get training or where they can learn about their rights. They are still intimidated. Unfortunately Nike withdrew from Mex Mode, because it said it was not going to give the factory work while there were problems with Antorcha Campesina.  

So we decided to step aside and fight for a workers' union, where workers are the ones who make the decisions. We set up the Liga in 2021. We have always had the support of the Solidarity Center. It gives us training and helps us plan. It teaches us what our rights are and how far we can go.

The League is based on workers, like the first union at Mex Mode in Atlixco. At Mex Mode we began to see that there were more companies that wanted to form their own unions. We started with VU, which became the first section of the League. We had to change our statutes to be able to support other companies when workers formed their own unions. The League grew and now it is national.  We have a section in Torreón, Coahuila, our coworkers have organized another at Testar in San Luis Potosí, and another at 3M and at Goodyear. Currently a union in Aguascalientes is being formed by key workers who came from Mex Mode in Atlixco. The factory in Torreón makes jeans. 3M in San Luis Potosí handles all kinds of work, adhesive tape, caps, face masks. Goodyear makes tires. They have the right of representation there now, and at 3M the negotiations are about to start.  

Even though the League is national, as general secretary I can't go and make decisions in other workers' companies. The workers in each company must have the right to their own voice and the right to make their own demands. They have to prepare, to decide what corresponds to the situation they have in their own plant, and what workers should earn for the benefit of themselves and their families. If a worker has good conditions the whole family benefits, but if a worker is harassed at work, the one who pays the consequences is also the family. We come home angry, stressed, tired and we don't spend quality time with our children.

The league is supported by the Solidarity Center, which sends organizers everywhere. At VU people also work with the organizer for CFO, Julia Quiñónez.  There the workers themselves asked us if they could join the League. So now there is a strategic relationship between CFO and the League.

The League tries to respect the decisions of the workers, not to make decisions for them, not to hinder their work. Because I am General Secretary at the national level, I have the organizers prepare the workers. Then we put more people to work on the plant. But if the workers do not begin to make their own decisions and prepare for their own campaign, we are going to fall back into the charrismo of the other unions. We want to change all that. The workers' committee is the one that must decide what they do within the plant. The worker is the only one who has the right to decide what is good and what is bad for his or her coworkers, for the company, or for their union.  

In a way, the CFO and the Solidarity Center are allies. Together we learn how to ensure the workers themselves understand they have rights, and that they are the only ones who can unite with other workers to win better working conditions. In the league and the CFO we share values, that the workers are in charge, in terms of the actions they are going to take. The Solidarity Center doesn't pay us. They simply provide us with training. When we go to meetings like this, they help us with the expenses.  

The League is for workers. It is independent and we do not receive support from any union. We have support alliances. We've supported the strike at Audi, and we have the closest relations with the union at Volkswagen.

At this meeting we are looking for international support and alliances. There are other companies where workers are going through the same thing or worse things. So exchanging information makes us stronger, to know that we are not alone, that there are more people who are also fighting, and that united we can win.

But often the Mexicans who are our bosses are the ones who trample on and violate our rights. VU was closed and would not accept the independent workers' union. They laid off all the staff, and 70 workers were left without pay. At the VU factory workers are producing for the automotive industry, so it is possible that the UAW union can put pressure through its relationships with large automobile companies.  

But now the workers who worked at VU, who decided to form their own union, are not being hired in other companies. The doors are being closed to them just for demanding their right to form their own independent union. For other companies to close their doors because workers want to fight for their rights is very unfair, but it is something that will not go away.  

The companies have a database of these workers. Other companies in Piedras Negras, Coahuila, also have the database of the workers who wanted to belong to the League. If the workers go there to ask for work, their name appears on the list. It's like saying, if you belong to an independent union, you can't work in the plant. That's how it is. That has an impact on the mentality of workers. You will no longer work in any company; you will be left without a job. That is the fear they put in the workers. Their family will pay the price.

Now there are many who are working in stores, because you have to look elsewhere. It is also a reason why people are deciding to cross the border. As workers we feel we are being put between a rock and a hard place, as we say in Mexico. Yes I want to demand my rights, yes I want to form an independent union. But if I do it, things could go bad, and I could lose my job. And I'm not going to be able to get more work because no one is going to give me another one.

I try to attend meetings to get to know people, what their objectives really are, which ones really are like us, demanding worker rights. When I hear the people in those other jobs, like domestic workers or platform workers, I am impressed by the fact that they are women. I am not saying I am a feminist and resent men, because that is not my role. My role is to say 50/50. Both men and women deserve respect and deserve rights.

But these women have the courage to demand their rights. The domestic workers do not work for any company, but are independent in a house, yet they are able to join together and fight for their rights. The platform workers are driving cars, motorcycles, bikes, and skates, which is very dangerous. It does not matter if we work in the fields. We all have rights and together in alliance we will be able to win.